Re: On-line Dog License Application (with questionnaire)


"Rocky" <3dogs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Fri999FD5B8DA2F5australianshepherdca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Paul E. Schoen" <pstech@xxxxxxxxx> said in
rec.pets.dogs.behavior:

"Rocky" <3dogs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Fri999ED03E5A8CEaustralianshepherdca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Paul E. Schoen" <pstech@xxxxxxxxx> said in
rec.pets.dogs.behavior:

High current at low voltage is fairly safe,

Backwards.

Certainly if the high current is going through your body,
especially your heart, it is not safe. Even 10 mA at 60 Hz
into the heart can cause fibrillation and death. But I'm
talking about the current going through a low impedance
like a circuit breaker, which requires only about the same
voltage as a car battery.

You've gone all AC-DC. Do you know the difference?

Probably their loud rock music has turned your brain to jelly. I might as
well try to explain this to Muttley.


It takes a certain amount of
voltage to deliver a dangerous current into the body,

How much? The correct answer is little to none. Norton
rules.

Who the hell is Norton and wtf does he have to do with this? Is he your
mighty master and you his brainless zombie?


and
it varies greatly depending on skin resistance and location
of the electrodes.

Natch.

Dele elementary non-whitespace circuit theory.

Too bad you are too stupid to understand even the simplest things, eh?


Thus I refute your "backwards" comment. Make sure you know
whereof you speak. What you don't know *can* kill you!

You're wrong. Deal with it.


Matt, it's hardly the best, but this reference might at least be easy for
you to comprehend, if you can handle the truth:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_shock

It's amazing that someone like Matt, with obviously some intelligence about
dogs, would act so childishly when his erroneous quip is shown to be in
error. And in this case, he is "dead wrong", yet he clings to his error
like a bratty toddler to his mother when told he has misbehaved. This
argument was discussed at length recently in a thread on
sci.electronics.design, by people such as myself with actual knowledge on
the subject. I'll accept his criticism for my possibly erroneous comments
about dog behavior, but what he thinks he knows about electricity is simply
stupid and dangerous. Yet his ego is so fragile that he cannot bear to be
proven wrong.

Probably I should not have dignified his stupid comments with a reply, but
I am curious about what other nonsense he might spew forth. Any more
wisecracks, Matt?

Paul, Muttley and Lucky


.

Relevant Pages

  • DN Cultivating Beatitude Attitudes 4/1/2006
    ... Cultivating Beatitude Attitudes ... And opening His mouth He began to teach them" (Matt. ... the heart or mind. ... Drawing Near, Copyright c 1993 John F. MacArthur, Jr. ...
    (alt.religion.christian)
  • DN Cultivating Beatitude Attitudes 4/1/2007
    ... Cultivating Beatitude Attitudes ... And opening His mouth He began to teach them" (Matt. ... the heart or mind. ... Drawing Near, Copyright c 1993 John F. MacArthur, Jr. ...
    (alt.religion.christian)
  • Re: El Cortez THIS bad??--INTERESTING FOLLOW UP
    ... who Matt was when I mentioned his name. ... fun with his first blog, ... truth from the likes of Hanratity, ... He just sits there looking stupid and when you punch him, ...
    (alt.vacation.las-vegas)
  • Re: McDonald - Chicago Eugene Volokh
    ... Matt wrote: ... 70s, but for you, it must be true, Oh Lord of Usenet. ... It is stupid to ask for wisdom, ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Fast Larry apologizes to RSB
    ... It felt good to make a true heart felt apology to all here or any ... It only works if nobody knows who you are, ... You argue with a faceless stranger. ... That was beyond stupid of me to waste my time doing that ...
    (rec.sport.billiard)