Re: Alert - Superpetz groomer charged with animal cruelty
- From: shelly <scouvrette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:36:40 -0500
on 2005-10-27 at 18:33 <mbeaudoin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Based on the above defintion of Abandonment, the groomer
>didn't.
thank you! i expected that might be the case.
--
shelly
http://www.cat-sidh.net
http://cat-sidh.blogspot.com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Alert - Superpetz groomer charged with animal cruelty
- From: September
- Re: Alert - Superpetz groomer charged with animal cruelty
- From: September
- Re: Alert - Superpetz groomer charged with animal cruelty
- References:
- Alert - Superpetz groomer charged with animal cruelty
- From: September
- Re: Alert - Superpetz groomer charged with animal cruelty
- From: culprit
- Re: Alert - Superpetz groomer charged with animal cruelty
- From: September
- Re: Alert - Superpetz groomer charged with animal cruelty
- From: shelly
- Re: Alert - Superpetz groomer charged with animal cruelty
- From: Marcel Beaudoin
- Alert - Superpetz groomer charged with animal cruelty
- Prev by Date: Re: Alert - Superpetz groomer charged with animal cruelty
- Next by Date: Re: Alert - Superpetz groomer charged with animal cruelty
- Previous by thread: Re: Alert - Superpetz groomer charged with animal cruelty
- Next by thread: Re: Alert - Superpetz groomer charged with animal cruelty
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|