Re: OT: Susan Boyle on "Britain's Got Talent"

Christina Websell <spamfree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<bastXXXette@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

I find it very easy to edit the ">>" lines so they show only the part
that I'm responding to (and maybe one or two quotes going back a bit
in the conversation, for context).

Of course you find it easy to edit. You can see your screen.

You're reading a lot more into what I said than was intended. I wasn't
commenting on the original point Dave made, and I wasn't trying to say
that because I can do it easily, everyone else should be able to. Don't
respond to things that I didn't actually say.

By the way, you snipped out the one line that made my intent a bit more
clear - where I said that I use the "tin" newsreader, which most people
would not want to use because you have to access it via a remote Linux
shell. I was simply remarking that I find it easy, nothing more than that.

--
Joyce ^..^

To email me, remove the XXX from my user name.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Dedekind Snap
    ... of responding line by line rather than reading my post with at least ... enough context to get to the next line before you go "???" ... plain errors of fact and reasoning - but ordinarily my posts do ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Compiling problem
    ... Santosh these messages lately I have been reading and responding ... Quotes of people within quotes of other people. ... Aren't you supposed to save the top nntp header? ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: OT: Susan Boyle on "Britains Got Talent"
    ... that I'm responding to (and maybe one or two quotes going back a bit ... in the conversation, for context). ... Of course you find it easy to edit. ...
    (rec.pets.cats.anecdotes)
  • Re: OT: Susan Boyle on "Britains Got Talent"
    ... that I'm responding to (and maybe one or two quotes going back a bit ... in the conversation, for context). ... Of course you find it easy to edit. ...
    (rec.pets.cats.anecdotes)
  • Re: The Dedekind Snap
    ... but you're doing that irritating thing again ... of responding line by line rather than reading my post with at least ... enough context to get to the next line before you go "???" ... P.S. I'll try to keep your complains in mind (when reading your posts) - ...
    (sci.logic)
Loading