Re: I thought I was dying

"Joy" <toastie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:HDMlk.15322$Wf4.1090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<bastXXXette@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:48977924$0$17205$742ec2ed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
MaryL <stancole1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Don't worry about it. I responded "just in case" Pat was serious about
this
joke convincing her never to have a mammogram. That's too important to
overlook. However, I seriously doubt if this joke -- or your
message --
would have anything at all to do with Pat's decision. Just read some
of her
previous comments about her views on medical care, and I think that
would
actually be the basis of her decision.

Well, in fairness, there is *some* controversy about the effectiveness
of mammograms. They don't necessarily find all breast cancers.

I still get them, though, because I would rather be doing something than
nothing, and it's not like they've been *proven* to be useless. In fact,
mammograms do find early cancers all the time. Besides, I don't know of
any
other diagnostic device for breast cancer. So if a mammogram were to fail
to find cancer, I'd be in the same place I would be if I hadn't had one.
Whereas if it does find it, then I'm better off, right?

--
Joyce ^..^

Exactly. It seems to me I've heard about something else that some doctors
recommend in addition to mammograms, but I've never heard of a doctor
recommending you not get one because it might not find cancer. Every few
years I end up having an ultrasound after my mammo, because I am prone to
cysts. I had my first one removed when I was 14 years old. I had another
one removed about 40 years later. In between, and since, I've had them,
but they come and go. I've had a couple of needle biopsies, but the
ultrasound can usually tell they are just cysts, so I haven't had one of
those in a long time. Now whenever they find a lump, I just assume it's
another cyst. So far it always has been. That doesn't keep me from
getting my annual mammo, though. However, my ob-gyn told me I only need 7
more, and then I can stop getting them. It seems they aren't necessary
after you are 80.

Joy

?????!!! Really?! Why aren't they necessary after you are 80? My
grandmother lived to be 104 - so she had 24 more years after 80 in which to
possibly get breast cancer.

Nose Kisses,

CatNipped


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: I thought I was dying
    ... joke convincing her never to have a mammogram. ... mammograms do find early cancers all the time. ... other diagnostic device for breast cancer. ... am prone to cysts. ...
    (rec.pets.cats.anecdotes)
  • Re: fibrocystic beast
    ... >>>Mammograms aren't nearly that painful, ... But breast cancer is an exception: ... most people who get cancer are elderly, so if early detection and treatment ... early detection always guarantees cure. ...
    (sci.med)
  • Re: fibrocystic beast
    ... >>> mammograms, and figured that people who complained about how painful ... But breast cancer is an exception: ... > most people who get cancer are elderly, so if early detection and treatment ... > early detection always guarantees cure. ...
    (sci.med)
  • Re: fibrocystic beast
    ... >>Mammograms aren't nearly that painful, ... is highest in the first two years following treatment, ... Breast cancer awareness campaigns urging women to have yearly ...
    (sci.med)
  • Re: I thought I was dying
    ... joke convincing her never to have a mammogram. ... mammograms do find early cancers all the time. ... other diagnostic device for breast cancer. ... am prone to cysts. ...
    (rec.pets.cats.anecdotes)