Re: OT - LA Bans Fast Food
- From: "kilikini" <kilikini1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:17:06 -0400
Joy wrote:
"Sherry" <sriddles@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ec84f63c-23f8-4687-bd9c-28a54716ffb0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 31, 10:29 am, Daniel Mahoney <d...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
snipped
The arguments I've heard from Food Nazis is that it hurts the entiresnipped
country, in that the public ends up paying for the increased medical
costs associated with an obese public.
Dan
This is the part that seemed to jump off the page to me. If I
understaood correctly, this poor, mostly-black-and-hispanic area is
the only area affected right now. So,
what's the reason for that? That the more affluent suburbs have better
health care insurance policies and the government *does* have so much
increased costs?
This is just weird, weird and disturbing. A big slab of prime rib
isn't exactly healthy, either. Are upscale restaurants going to be
next? Taxed, maybe, for serving unhealthy items on the menu? Sheesh.
There are greasepoon diners everywhere that make McDonald's look like
health food. This is just crazy.
Sherry
***
There are already lots of fast food places in that area. They aren't
affected at all. The ban is on *new* fast food places in the area.
Nothing is being taken away from the people who live there.
Joy
Exactly, Joy. It's on NEW places because the area is already way too
flooded with fast-food restaurants.
kili
.
- References:
- OT - LA Bans Fast Food
- From: CatNipped
- Re: OT - LA Bans Fast Food
- From: Daniel Mahoney
- Re: OT - LA Bans Fast Food
- From: Sherry
- Re: OT - LA Bans Fast Food
- From: Joy
- OT - LA Bans Fast Food
- Prev by Date: Re: I have discovered
- Next by Date: Re: I have discovered
- Previous by thread: Re: OT - LA Bans Fast Food
- Next by thread: Re: OT - LA Bans Fast Food
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|