Re: Susan M.'s Address
- From: Outsider <not@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Feb 2008 13:52:10 GMT
Victor Martinez <me@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:62cjm5F22e5sbU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
tanadashoes wrote:
While not nice about it, r is right, I shouldn't have posted Susan's
last name and connected it to her address. I've deleted the
offending post and apologized. Twice.
With all due respect... BS. Anybody can find anybody's name and
address. There is no privacy on the internet. Deal with it.
Cute but not 100% true and while it is true that Susan permitted her name
and address to escape into the public domain herself it still would have
been the right thing to do to hear Fred or Susan say it is ok to print it
so explicitly. Your getting upset at the person who pointed this out as
well as tanadashoes seemed odd (to me). Some people need more privacy than
you may need and for _reasons_ which they may also need to be kept private.
Privacy, even on the Internet, is still possible (if difficult) those who
want it should be encouraged to maintain itnot the reverse.
Andy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Susan M.'s Address
- From: Victor Martinez
- Re: Susan M.'s Address
- From: 22brix
- Re: Susan M.'s Address
- References:
- Susan M.'s Address
- From: Charleen Welton
- Re: Susan M.'s Address
- From: Victor Martinez
- Re: Susan M.'s Address
- From: tanadashoes
- Re: Susan M.'s Address
- From: Victor Martinez
- Susan M.'s Address
- Prev by Date: Re: Kitty Farmcat (good news)
- Next by Date: Re: I just submitted a couple of lolcats
- Previous by thread: Re: Susan M.'s Address
- Next by thread: Re: Susan M.'s Address
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
