Re: Health and money purrs needed



Sherry wrote:
On Aug 3, 6:34 pm, "CatNipped" <lcr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Now the really, really bad news. My new insurance only pays for
preventative treatment up to a $1,500 deductible per year and then
after that still only pays a portion of your cost. So I have to pay
for all the testing and all the treatment out of our non-existent
savings!

Some purrs for both my health and my pocket book would be greatly
appreciated.


I'm sorry you're having such trouble. It is so silly for insurance
companies to balk
at preventive care. I guess they want you to wait till you get
*really* sick, then they'll
pay for it!! I could really go off on a tangent about insurance, I am
having trouble with
them too.

Until the HMO's started getting so damned tight with the purse strings (yes,
there was a time way back in the deep mists of time when they weren't, I
worked for one run by Prudential), the emphasis was on preventive care.
They'd cover a full physical once a year, annual PAP smear (& mammograms for
women over 35); all the annual shots for babies and school age kids, for a
small copayment. The idea was, don't wait until you're so sick you don't go
to the doctor... you can afford $10. And if it was determined you were ill,
they'd cover that too. Sometimes at a slightly reduced %, depending on
which plan your employer signed up for.

All that got lost in the administrative shuffle and the money-grabbing
mentality. Doctor's used to be gung-ho about the HMO concept until
administrative types started trying to tell them how to practice medicine by
refusing to approve legitimate treatments for known illnesses. It's a damn
shame, really.

Jill


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: USA Political Question/UK Health care
    ... She has a 'carer' who comes in three times a week to help her have a bath, ... She does pay a contribution towards the carer - because it is assessed ... Part of the reason the Canadian health care had a problem was that too ... It means that anyone in this country making minimum wage can have treatment and lab test they need when they need it same as me. ...
    (rec.crafts.textiles.needlework)
  • Re: OT: USA Political Question/UK Health care
    ... some assessment of need for treatment? ... If it's ever approved, it'll cost over $20,000 a year, however, many of the patients in the original trial were able to return to employment. ... The government would rather pay $15,000+ a year every year for the rest of your life for disability benefits and Medicaid than to pay $20,000 for one year, get you back to work/paying taxes, and then you can afford to pay for your own treatments. ...
    (rec.crafts.textiles.needlework)
  • Re: Socialized Medicine
    ... lymphoma and now, thyroid cancer. ... he can't get treatment, because he can't ... the state won't pay for it, ... The same has happened with Medicare -- higher and higher monthly ...
    (alt.support.arthritis)
  • Re: Jeremy Clarkson article - Richard is winning his fight
    ... your argument seemed to be that if you pay taxes you can use the services. ... Your treatment costs money and there are better uses for it than purging you of your alcopops. ... Both are an equally unnecessary drain on NHS resources. ...
    (uk.media.tv.misc)
  • Unnecessary Porlongation of Treatment
    ... I just received a letter from my son's orthodontist insisting I pay ... I have been at every appointment my son has had ... parents in the treatment room. ... was to inform me that his wisdom teeth needed to be removed ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)