Re: OT: Something to think about in the wake of the Don Imus Crucifiction
- From: "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)" <evgmsop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 15:05:04 -0700
Nomen Nescio wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I'm no fan of Don Imus, but I'm posting this 'cause I'm totally disgusted with
the new attitude in this country that "You are free to say what is politically correct".
Freedom of speech is not just freedom to speak the inoffensive.
(rest of lengthy diatribe snipped)
FYI, there WAS a time (in days when public speech was far more "free" than it is now) when NO public broadcaster was "free" to use offensive language (such as calling a woman a "ho" - meaning "whore"). That included such comparatively innocuous words as "damn" and "hell". Words like "prostitute" were allowed in factual news broadcasts, but neither newscasters nor commentators (there IS a difference, although the lines nowadays have been blurred past recognition) were allowed to indulge in insulting language and name-calling. It is very disquieting that foul-mouthed insults by some cretin with a minimum education in the English language are now deemed to be "humour". If you are really concerned about loss of freedom of speech in America, suppose you oppose the monopolization of our mass-media by private interests who only allow their OWN choice of the "news" to be heard on the major broadcast outlets! Thank God the Internet is still free, allowing us otherwise ignorant Americans access to British and Canadian news sources. (Also those of other countries, if we can read their languages.)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Something to think about in the wake of the Don Imus Crucifiction
- From: jXwXeXrXmXoXnXt
- Re: OT: Something to think about in the wake of the Don Imus Crucifiction
- Prev by Date: Mango - RB
- Next by Date: Re: Corelle CATastrophy
- Previous by thread: Mango - RB
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Something to think about in the wake of the Don Imus Crucifiction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|