Re: OT-Bad news for pot-puffers....
- From: nothermark <nothermark@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Apr 2009 22:34:01 -0500
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:34:12 -0600, JD <hamguy1956@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 13 Apr 2009 16:17:02 -0500, nothermark <nothermark@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
2. You read the cancer article. I lost count of the number of
could's. It says they don't know but it might. Typical zero content
scare piece.
But you believe similar studies with even more cuddas re: global
warming! Curious. Ask for peer reviewed studies with data. Hmmmmmmm
you can't find any? Nor could I?
Goes along with the only scientists who are not big global warming
advocates are the Climatologists.
.
- References:
- OT-Bad news for pot-puffers....
- From: Lone Haranguer
- Re: OT-Bad news for pot-puffers....
- From: cj
- Re: OT-Bad news for pot-puffers....
- From: Lone Haranguer
- Re: OT-Bad news for pot-puffers....
- From: nothermark
- Re: OT-Bad news for pot-puffers....
- From: Lone Haranguer
- Re: OT-Bad news for pot-puffers....
- From: nothermark
- Re: OT-Bad news for pot-puffers....
- From: JD
- OT-Bad news for pot-puffers....
- Prev by Date: Re: OT-- Landfill Loon RUNS for His Hidey Hole (Was Pirates)
- Next by Date: Re: OT Antother Wi-Fi network Question
- Previous by thread: Re: OT-Bad news for pot-puffers....
- Next by thread: Re: OT-Bad news for pot-puffers....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|