Re: OT ~ Send a message

Lone Haranguer wrote:
Max wrote:

"Lone Haranguer" <linuszrv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote


Of course you are smarter than biologists and other sicentists who agree
that a unique person with their own combination of genes and DNA exist
after conception. You actually think that isn't a fact?
*********************
LZ


The "evidence" you've presented presupposes that the ovum is *not* alive.
What profound biological process takes place within the brief moment of time when the sperm penetrates the ovum that changes the status from "un-alive" to alive?

When the cells start reproducing their unique combination of genes and DNA that no other human has,

My rose bushes are "alive".
My rapidly receding hair is alive until it falls out.

And you hold the lives of what will become a human being in the same regard.

I'm not enough interested in the outcome of the anti-pro argument to dig up all the opinions that contradict what you've posted.
My opinion is based upon this:
The undifferentiated cells that will *become" a human do not become a *human* until they basically resemble a human.

Then cutting off part of your *** would be okay as long as we leave a stub. It's still a ***.

If you consider that "vehement", so be it.

Vehement and ignorant.
LZ

Max




LZ are you saying that you are going to Bobit Max.

--
BILL P.
&
DOG
.

Loading