Re: OT Minimum wage


"Bob Hatch" <bobhatch@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:000ad335$0$32284$c3e8da3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Don Bradner" <donb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:9cqhh450tfu8eoogjbnjmttf8vnrs4bngq@xxxxxxx
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:35:08 -0700, "Bob Hatch" <bobhatch@xxxxxx>
wrote:

There are only a limited number of things that can happen when a
business is "forced" to increase costs. They can raise prices, the
most likely thing to happen if their labor costs are balanced to
start with. They can cut staff if they can find the place to cut, a
negative impact to the economy. They can cut other costs, which will
in the long run will have a negative roll through the economy.

There is nothing positive that will happen with a forced increase in
labor cost, for the business, or the individual.

I've never made a price rise, nor ever seen a price rise from my
competitors or my suppliers, that could be directly attributable to
any specific increase in costs including minimum wage. Similarly I've
never seen a price decrease directly attributable to a specific cost
decrease (such as when California eliminated the inventory tax).

Of course you haven't. It's not that direct, like the day after the law is passed, the prices go up and unemployment increases. It's time generated. After a period of time the trucking company has to pop it's price up a tiny bit to cover the cost of cleaning the warehouse and trucks. On back down the line a price raises here or there by a penny or two, and eventually it will impact you.

Pricing is much more subtle, and can run counter to costs. What I'm
seeing these days is that we've needed to do across-the-board cuts in
prices in order to maintain volume, even as our costs have risen. That
has been a necessary choice, because we are heavily dependent on
volume purchasing to maintain current discounts, and allowing volume
to fall by keeping prices where they were would have a greater impact
on the bottom line than reduced retail prices have.

Because, as you've said, you are heavily dependent on volume, you must maintain volume purchases, but you cannot continue to cut price to maintain volume forever. At some point you will have to cut someplace to maintain your profits. Maybe, because you're a good guy, you've kept all your staff on at full pay. Maybe you've not tried to find a cheaper packaging for your mail outs, or cut back on electric or who knows what, but eventually you will. You can't make up a loss by selling more. :-)

Competition and choices about what volume of business you want to
maintain are primary driving forces. All cost variations (including
loss-leaders) are at least somewhat secondary. You can still get
McDonald's Dollar Menu in California where the minimum wage is $8 per
hour.

Of course you can, because they plan on you buying something else. Bigger fries, bigger drink, apple pie, ice cream. Maybe not everybody does, but enough do that in the long run the dollar menu produces a heck of a lot more than a dollar per customer who start with the dollar order.

Presumably a lot of the volume in those Dollar Meals come from minimum
wage earners who can afford to eat those burgers precisely because
their minimum wage isn't too minimal!

An that is where the argument fails, because according to:
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Economy/images/wm1320_table_lg.gif

The majority of minimum wager earners are suburban teenagers, not who you think they are.

"Data from the Department of Labor show that most minimum wage-earners are young, part-time workers and that relatively few live below the poverty line. Their average family income is over $50,000 a year. A minimum wage hike, then, is a raise for suburban teenagers, not the working poor."

The report goes on to say:

"Minimum-wage earners fall into two distinct categories: young workers, usually in school, and older workers who have left school. Most minimum-wage earners fall into the first category: 52 percent of those earning $5.15 or less per hour are between the ages of 16 and 24.[4] The rest are 25 or older.
Minimum-wage workers under 25 are typically not their family's sole breadwinner. Rather, they tend to live in middle-class households that do not rely on their earnings. Generally, they have not finished their schooling and are working part-time jobs. These workers represent the largest group that would directly benefit from a higher minimum wage."

The table on this page:
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Economy/images/wm1320_table_lg.gif

Shows that the majority of minimum wage earners live in households where the household income is 200% above the poverty line, that most are part time, and most are between the ages of 16 and 24.

So what you, Giddings, GB and Max are really hollering for is a raise for teenagers, from above average income homes, who are working for spending money and experience. Does that knowledge make you feel good?

--
"You can say any foolish thing to a dog, and the dog
will give you a look that says, 'My God, you're right!
I never would've thought of that!'"
--Dave Barry
http://www.bobhatch.com
http://www.tdsrvresort.com

Hey, Bob, I'm not arguing for anything. I'm was just asking.
I can't seem to get very serious about any of these OT threads. I just like to stir the pot.

Max

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The minimum wage was $8 an hour in 1968
    ... >>services like serving up hamburgers or mowing lawns. ... all of the operating costs are in minimum wage labor. ... costs include materials, rent, utilities, insurance, and taxes. ... accept the higher prices as the norm. ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Re: AC Casinos may shut down..
    ... I'm amazed that you think it is a bad idea:) The minimum wage worked ... Democrats for years. ... Business set prices based on what the market will bear. ... prices by just add up their costs, throw in a few cents for profit. ...
    (alt.vacation.las-vegas)
  • Re: A Word of Advice During a Housing Slump: Rent
    ... Planning for net worth using real estate is tricky, imho, because ... than renters and have lost money on their investment in the meantime. ... The analysis includes data on housing costs and looks at different ... possibilities for the path of home prices in coming years. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: U.S. Oil Industry Made $100 billion in Windfall Profits; Eliminating Refineries Paved Way for Ga
    ... Blaming the Middle East Countries for the rise in oil prices at the ... highest quarterly profits of any public company in history: ... gas means a $70,000 increase in annual fuel costs to the city budget, ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Is Bush deaf, dumb, blind, or stupid -- or all of the above?? Consumer prices, inflation ris
    ... Living Costs Rising Fast, and Wages Are Trailing ... Prices of a wide range of common products in the Consumer Price Index ... failed to keep pace with inflation, ... Some economists have argued that as Americans cut back their spending, ...
    (alt.politics)
Loading