Re: OT-Watch it or mebbee be silent!! was... You Tube Convicts Democrats

bill horne wrote:
Dave Woodruff wrote:
"Lon VanOstran" <lcvanostran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6kfb14F7mupdU2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Bruce S wrote:

"Tom T" <tominkirkland@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:D1uEk.1024$Dk4.215@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Gar wrote:

nothermark wrote:

On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:26:41 -0600, Lone Haranguer
<linuszrv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs

Any questions?
LZ
Never had any but nice catch.

Sign below if you have watched this video...
If you haven't or won't... well...

Ol' Gar Holy *** batman.. the jig is up!!!
It's a bunch of sound bites taken out of context and only showing
the best of the repubs and the worst of the dems. If you take
those tiny pieces of the big picture and think the dots are
connected correctly, you're not as smart as I thought you were.

Tom

So, are you claiming that the Democrats were NOT saying that there
was no problem with Fan/Fred in 2004?

Are you saying that the Democrats were not obstructing more
regulation? Bruce
You can't confuse Ben/Tom with facts. He won't believe any that
don't fit his pre-conclusion.

Lon

Despite the fact that his lame question has been answered directly
in the past. The fact that the Dem's controlled the committee that
has to forward the bill to the floor. Not saying there were not
some Republicans getting money and all should be prosecuted and sent
to prison. The Dem's were the major blocking force.

Tom filters babies screaming on airplanes. Therefore, there are no
screaming babies on airplanes.

Hey. It was his metaphor, not mine. I just ran with it.

I must have been aware of the screaming baby, otherwise I wouldn't have
filtered him. Using a filter on a case by case basis doesn't make you
blind.

Your theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

Hey. It was his metaphor, not mine. I just ran with it. ;-)

Tom

--
http://www.rvlover.net
http://weather.rvlover.net


.

Quantcast