Re: OT Plonking
- From: Janet Wilder <kelliepoodle@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 21:22:42 -0500
nothermark wrote:
On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:22:32 -0500, Janet Wilder
<kelliepoodle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Will wrote:
Also agree. Many of the members of my twit list have long sinceYour "twit list" is a published fiction. You keep yammering about it, but you never fail to respond to those who you say are in your filter.
proven themselves impervious to my logic. That may well be because I'm
incapable of persuading them, but regardless of the reason, dicussion
is impossible.
Liar.
Nope - quotes
I maintain a very short KF simply because people quote the morons in
their response so I get to read it anyway if it looks interesting. I
assume Will, or anyone else, has the same problem.
I have been filtering a couple of posters here for a long time. I see their posts when others quote them, Usually I ignore them, sometimes I read them, but that doesn't mean I have to respond to them.
when one "plonks" someone it generally means that they don't wish to read their posts nor have a dialog with them. Will reads (or at least he "thinks" he reads it) and responds.
--
Janet Wilder
Bad spelling. Bad punctuation
Good Friends. Good Life
.
- References:
- Re: OT-: Watch the attacks now.
- From: Lon VanOstran
- Re: OT-: Watch the attacks now.
- From: bill horne
- Re: OT-: Watch the attacks now.
- From: Peter Pan
- Re: OT-: Watch the attacks now.
- From: Peter Pan
- OT Plonking
- From: Will
- Re: OT Plonking
- From: Janet Wilder
- Re: OT Plonking
- From: nothermark
- Re: OT-: Watch the attacks now.
- Prev by Date: Re: Shotguns in Alaska
- Next by Date: Re: OT - Ya done good, John.
- Previous by thread: Re: OT Plonking
- Next by thread: Re: OT-: Watch the attacks now.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|