OT ~ Dr. Bill Wattenburg On Quick Build Of Nuclear Power and Oil
- From: "JanOrme99@xxxxxxx" <JanOrme99@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
Three ways to get the first new nuclear power plants built very
quickly
Bill Wattenburg- KGO Radio AM810 - San Francisco, California
June 2008
Three ways to get the first new nuclear power plants built very
quickly
Nuclear power is absolutely essential to achieve any long-term energy
independence.
A) Congress and the state governments must authorize and clear the
way for the immediate expansion of existing nuclear power plants
that were originally designed and approved for more reactors than
are operating in these plants today. We could build 40 to 50 new
nuclear reactors at the existing nuclear power plant sites. This
way, no new sites must be selected and approved with long delays and
local opposition. There are dozens of nuclear power plants in the
U.S. that already have the facilities and infrastructure in place
for more nuclear reactors. They were approved long ago. And these
plants are in the regions that need more energy every year. But
these regions have been building more filthy coal burning power plants
that are adding hundreds of millions of tons of CO2 and other
pollutants to the atmosphere each year. Simply expanding the
existing nuclear power plants that have been operating continuously
for over forty years is the biggest reduction of greenhouse gases
that can be accomplished without shutting down the American
economy.
B) The government can build the first new nuclear power plants in
the U.S. at existing government power projects. This should be
the modern “Apollo Project” or “ Manhattan Project” to build new
energy for the U.S.
Why not? Congress already passed laws to guarantee the investment
in the first five new nuclear plants built in the U.S. (Was going
to the moon in 1969 more important than rescuing 150 million working
American families today from the bankruptcy of $10 a gallon gasoline
for the next ten years? Was going to the moon more important than
stopping the production of billions of tons of greenhouse gases
every year from coal burning power plants?
Without new nuclear plants to avoid building more coal plants, the
U.S. will be increasing, not decreasing, CO2 in the atmosphere by at
least 2% each year. Our political leaders calling for reduction in
global warming look like silly hypocrites when they do not call for
stopping the building of more coal burning power plants. However,
there are plans to build at least 100 new coal plants on the drawing
board now -- and not a peep out of the so-called environmental
organizations who oppose nuclear power.
C) Turn the foolish “excess profits” attack on the oil companies
into something constructive. Require the rich oil companies to use
part of their profits for something of long-term good. Require that
they build nuclear power plants with a small share of their profits.
This will profit the country and they oil companies as well. The
major oil companies could build five new nuclear plants a year with
just ten percent of their profits -- and they will have an income and
the nation will have non-polluting, inexpensive energy long after the
oil is gone.
Option A) is without doubt the quickest way to get America moving
forward. Diablo Canyon in California is a good example of where
more reactors were authorized than were built. Diablo Canyon could
double its energy generating capacity -- and make the biggest
greenhouse gas reduction possible for California . Diablo Canyon
was originally approved for four nuclear reactors. Only two
reactors were built after years of attacks by anti-nuclear fanatics
who ran up the construction costs by billions of dollars. The large
power plant site, security, power lines, and infrastructure are all
in place for at least two additional modern nuclear reactors. Only
the anti-nuclear obstructionists stand in the way of California
making a big addition to this nation’s non-polluting energy supply and
a big reduction in greenhouse gases.
Diablo Canyon has saved California from energy crises since it began
operating. This one nuclear plant alone has been supplying 24%
of the energy for northern California for decades. And it produces
no greenhouse gases or pollution to the atmosphere whatsoever.
However, another 50 percent of northern California’s energy is
produced by filthy fossil fuel power plants the are putting 100
million tons of CO2 in the atmosphere every year – and more every
year because California needs another 1000 megawatts of new energy
each year – another major power plant. (Keep in mind that so-called
“clean natural gas” power plants put 40% as much CO2 in the
atmosphere as coal burning plants.)
The anti-nuclear politicians in California are the biggest and most
vulgar Climate Change hypocrites in the world. They passed a law
(AB 32) demanding that the California public reduce greenhouse gases
by 20% in ten years. But these same political leaders are
authorizing and building new fossil fuel power plants every year to
supply the state’s increasing energy demands (1000 megawatts per
year.) These new fossil fuel power plants are adding 3% more CO2
to the atmosphere each year, at least another 3 million tons of CO2
each year. This is more CO2 than can be reduced by all the AB 32
restrictive regulations on the working people in California !
The anti-nuclear policies of California’s politicians guarantee that
California will add 20% more CO2 to the atmosphere over the next ten
years, not reduce by 20% -- and they know this, while they lie to
the public that trusted them to run the state.
The First New Nuclear Plant
Everything will fall in place as soon as construction starts on the
first new nuclear plant in the U.S. No arguments, facts, or state
of emergency will convince the fanatical anti-nuclear crowd to change
their minds. They will resist and cover their past monumental
mistakes until new construction is a reality. They will never admit
to the damage they have done to the U.S. working public and the world
ecosystem by forcing this country to build filthy coal burning plants
and creating the greenhouse gases blamed for global warming.
That first new nuclear plant in the U.S is the most important thing
on which all effort must be focused. It matters not where it is
built or who builds it, so long as it is one of the designs already
preapproved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Then
there is good reason for congress to waive all future bureaucratic
delay and environmental opposition so long as the NRC approves the
sites and designs.
Once the first new plant is underway and congress eliminates
bureaucratic delay and environmental fraud lawsuits to stop
construction, there will be a stampede to build the hundreds more
nuclear plants that the U.S. must build to even slow down global
warming and prove that we will take care of our own energy needs.
There is no time to waste. There are plans now to build 120 new
coal burning plants in the U.S. to keep up with growing energy
demands. Only non-polluting, modern nuclear plants can replace
these filthy coal plants that will generate another 500 million
tons of CO2 and toxins. The new coal plants will increase the
U.S. contribution to global warming by 20%! (while anti-nuclear
politicians lie to the unsuspecting public and claim we can reduce
by 20%). The U.S. economy will not be allowed to die because of
too little energy. It will be one or the another, more coal plants
or new nuclear plants.
And finally, there is one more thing that must be done to make any of
the above options possible. Congress must stop obstructionism by
environmental frauds. Congress must take away the money in the
National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) and Endangered Species
Act (ESA) that pays eco –fraud organizations to file lawsuits and
blackmail the public and stop all development of our resources in
this nation.
_______________________________________________
Discussion and Opinions:
Top scientists and internationally recognized environmentalists alike
now agree that we made a big mistake in killing nuclear power in the
U.S forty years ago. That forced us to relying on coal and
natural gas power plants that have created the excess CO2 greenhouse
gas that is blamed for global warming. They agree that nuclear
is now the only large source of non-polluting energy that can
replace the fossil fuels that are creating global warming. Our
nation will be bankrupt if we have to buy oil from overseas
forever. We must start building the FIRST NEW NUCLEAR PLANT
IMMEDIATELY. Everything will fall in place after that. The sobered
and educated public will demand that more be built as soon as
possible.
But even if we started construction on a hundred new nuclear plants
tomorrow, the American working public will be blackmailed for the
gas to drive to work for at least another six to eight years. We
can only relieve the unfair burden on our working families in the
interim by quickly tapping our own oil resources in the U.S. as
soon as possible. We can be producing more of our own oil within
two to three years if we start now.
The most important thing is that the oil producing countries and OPEC
will bring down the price of oil only when they see the U.S.
developing its own vast reserves of oil --- and they see us building
nuclear plants for the long-term at the same time.
The U.S. can achieve long-term energy independence only by using
nuclear energy -- and lots of it -- as soon as possible. In the
interim, we must tap into our own vast reserves of oil that are now
blocked off from drilling with the senseless arguments that our land
is more precious than the land of other countries who are producing
the oil we are using. The selfish environmental fraud organizations
have used our courts to stop every effort in the U.S. to develop
sufficient energy for the American working families who must drive to
work. Most of our political leaders stood by and did nothing while
gasoline soared to $5.00 a gallon. It will go higher before we can
protect ourselves and bring it down. The oil producing countries
know that we allowed ourselves to become helpless. They are
blackmailing us for good reason.
Abundant, cheap nuclear energy is the only way we will ever have
real alternative fuels for our vehicles, such as natural gas and
maybe hydrogen someday. Nuclear power plants will allow for the
first time widespread use of electric cars that can be charged
inexpensively at night. The use of electricity generated in fossil
fuel power plants to charge electric cars is just plain stupid. It
creates more greenhouse gas than just burning the fossil fuel
directly in the cars. And we are now burning fossil fuels in our
power plants to produce ethanol with large government subsidies.
That is equally stupid.
The anti-nuclear fanatics and environmental frauds organizations set
up this nation to be blackmailed by the oil producing countries.
Thirty years ago, they killed all expansion and development of
nuclear power in this country by spreading scare stories that are
whole cloth lies. And they persist today. There has been only one
serious nuclear accident in the U.S. in over forty years, Three Mile
Island . It was caused by idiot operators who deliberately shut down
the safety equipment in the plant. This caused the plant to be
destroyed, but no damage to the surrounding population. The billion-
dollar containment dome over the nuclear reactor contained all
radioactivity, just as it was designed to do. After Three Mile
Island , the anti-nuclear fanatics forced this nation to build
hundreds of filthy coal burning power plants to supply this nation’s
energy needs. They loaded our atmosphere with billions of tons of
greenhouse gases and thousands of tons of radioactive elements from
the coal burning power plants. Much the same environmental fear
mongers and frauds also demanded that we put most of our oil
resources off limits to drilling and production. This has left us
totally dependent on oil from overseas for two-thirds of our needs.
For the next six to eight years, the only salvation for the
American working people who must drive to work will be to drill for
the oil that sets in the vast areas of the U.S. that were foolishly
closed off. At the same time, we must build the non-polluting
nuclear power plants that are the only way we will ever have the
energy to develop alternative transportation fuels to take the place
of oil when it is depleted around the world.
There is an estimated 85 billion barrels of oil in areas of the U.S.
that have been blocked off from exploration. The estimated 10
billion barrels of oil in a postage stamp area of the Alaskan
National Wildlife (ANWAR) may be the quickest new oil supply we can
develop. (The entire Anwar is the size of the northeastern states.
The only area to be drilled is smaller than New York City .) ANWAR
can be connected to the shipping infrastructure that has been
delivering Alaskan oil from Prudhoe Bay for the last twenty years.
The obstructionists claim that it is too little to be worth the
effort. Too little? Ten billion barrels of oil is an additional
one million barrels per day for the U.S. -- every day for at least
the next eight years. The world is now hoping that Saudi Arabia will
increase its production by half that amount to bring down that
outrageous price of oil. An addition of one million barrels per
day is an immediate 12% increase in production of oil in the U.S.
It means that the American public will not have to send almost 50
billion dollars a year to foreign countries for oil at present
prices. Is that insignificant? Is that too little to be worth the
effort?
The environmental fraud organizations claim that the ANWAR ecosystem
is too valuable to take a chance that there will be an oil spill in
the area. But they cannot answer why the ecosystem in ANWAR is more
precious than the land in foreign countries that are asked to drill
for oil for the U.S. The obstructionists don’t dare stand up and
tell the public that all drilling for oil in other countries should
stop and that the American economy should be destroyed.
*Dr Willard H. (Bill) Wattenburg is a senior research scientist at the
Research Foundation, California State University, Chico; and a
scientific consultant for the University of California Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory and many other institutions. He is a
former nuclear weapons designer at the Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory; a former member of the US Air Force Scientific Advisory
Board; and a former UC Berkeley professor of electrical engineering.
He is also the host of the very popular radio talk show, “The Open
Line to the West Coast,” KGO Radio AM810, ABC Network, San Francisco
(six hours per week since 1972, Saturday and Sunday nights 10pm to
1am). This is the most listened to night-time radio talk show in
eleven western states in that time slot. He has appeared in several
Clint Eastwood movies.
Scientific Work and Background at www.pushback.com/wattenburg
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Posted without comment.
Jan Eric Orme
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT ~ Dr. Bill Wattenburg On Quick Build Of Nuclear Power and Oil
- From: Technobarbarian
- Re: OT ~ Dr. Bill Wattenburg On Quick Build Of Nuclear Power and Oil
- Prev by Date: Re: Iowa Crime Wave
- Next by Date: Re: These Five Bastards Give Liberals A Bad Name.
- Previous by thread: OT ~ Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona
- Next by thread: Re: OT ~ Dr. Bill Wattenburg On Quick Build Of Nuclear Power and Oil
- Index(es):