Re: Ford Truck Recall
- From: Dean <roamer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 17:33:10 -0700
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 21:45:01 -0600, william boyd
<williamboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dean wrote:
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 13:37:08 -0600, william boydAnd if it was your brother you would agree, RIGHT.
<williamboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Advocate54 wrote:
Only in war is collateral damage acceptable. A single accident is notI will reiterate my thought here - one accident per year (no numbers givenI cannot see how counting accidents has any bearing on the subject...how
for deaths), out of millions of vehicles, and many millions of miles
driven, in NOT a serious problem. More people die from falls in bathtubs
every year than from problems with Ford's camshaft position sensor. Lets
be serious, if there is a defect, it would be nice if Ford fixed it,
however, one accident per yearis not a problem worth any special effort.
many failures were there? Perhaps there were 100,000 failures.
acceptable.
Oh, Brother.
I wouldn't like it but I would accept it for what it is...an
unintentionable, and likely unavoidable accident. Just like I did
when my dad died of brain cancer at 47.
dean
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ford Truck Recall
- From: william boyd
- Re: Ford Truck Recall
- References:
- Ford Truck Recall
- From: Frank Tabor
- Re: Ford Truck Recall
- From: Bruce S
- Re: Ford Truck Recall
- From: Mark Jones
- Re: Ford Truck Recall
- From: Bruce S
- Re: Ford Truck Recall
- From: Advocate54
- Re: Ford Truck Recall
- From: william boyd
- Re: Ford Truck Recall
- From: Dean
- Re: Ford Truck Recall
- From: william boyd
- Ford Truck Recall
- Prev by Date: Re: OT:War criminals?
- Next by Date: Re: Florida in January
- Previous by thread: Re: Ford Truck Recall
- Next by thread: Re: Ford Truck Recall
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|