Re: ot Roland Oklahoma Forrced to stop enforcement on I-40

Dan wrote:

Lone Haranguer <linusz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:55jprsF258plcU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:


Why? Were the dunut crumbs attracting deer and putting dents the
cars of the feds?


The local yokels should have a bake sale to finance Barney and his
pals; not hold up transient traffic.


Don't you believe in the localizing of control as much as possible
in order that the little people will have the most say in their
government as possible?


You're trying to control people who don't live in your burg but are
just passing through.


It depends on what they are toting and how fast. We don't have the
right to search private individual humans, but I'll be damned if I'll
let fictitious persons like corporations and governments tote nuclear
waste right through the middle of our little town with out a good old
fashioned pat down. Oh wait. Would that mean we would be frisking
nuclear materials without sophistocated protection?


So you're going to stop them and allow even more radiation to
sterilize the townsfolk?


That's why we have to patrol down the interstate a spell.

Your cops have no authority beyond your city limits. Except in hot pursuit or deputized for special purposes.


Maybe you should ask the neighboring town to do the dirty work?


We are too honorable to inflict our dirty work on them.

Probably they hate your guts.

You could mount a Geiger counter under a bridge to alert you.


We don't own a bridge far enough out for early enough warning.

Then use a post.


Let Barney hassle the locals and let the sheriff and the state patrol
deal with freeway traffic. We don't need 3 layers of enforcement, ESPECIALLY since the locals are only interested in revenue
enhancement and not freeway safety.


Why should we trust the empire with the welfare of the peasantry?
Show me examples in history suggesting the wisdom of that, please.


Speed traps just encourage crooked cops.


It's not crooked to raise funds from infractors.

Your town cops don't make the rules on I-40. You'd be enforcing someone else's laws strictly for monetary purposes.

We would not need to
raise legal funds to pay for our case against the US military and its public/private partnership fictitious persons if they weren't doing their experiments on our townsfolk.

What experiments? Putting something in the water so all offspring are retarded?

I do see some evidence of that....

Say: You don't want to take us back to the days of taxation without representation or do you?


Please. That is exactly what you are supporting if you want locals arresting the out of state tourists. Besides the word will get out
and no passing tourist will even get off the freeway to buy gas or
eat a doughnut.


No, we respect individuals. What we don't respect is fictitious
persons porting nuclear waste and experimental military weapons
around our town's perimeter for a little testing on the peasantry.


And this has what to do with your local fuzz stopping motorists on the
freeway?


Legal funds to make our case with higher government bodies or barring that lobbying them to allow our townsfolk their health and safety.

I think bake sales would have a better chance. The feds might close your on ramps to I-40 and your cops will be tarred and feathered by the local populace.


I think you should head for the nearest mental health
clinic.....prontito.


No, its quite sane to want out of a military experiment. I can't say the same for those who want to experiment on us though. Nor for their defenders--like you.

If there were a military experiment going on, you wouldn't know about it until it was over.


Next thing you know some hick town with an empty treasury will
put up a toll booth.


Better them than the feds should do it, right?


The feds aren't doing it.


Are you sure? Well, if they aren't, the sure are planning on it.
Aren't they already using unique identifiers in cars and sensors on
toll lanes to detect unpaid usage and mail fines? Well, if not, they
are planning on it.


Which federal agency is running toll booths? All the ones I'm
familiar with are run by the states.


I don't know. If they aren't yet, they are planning on it. Have you
heard of the NAFTA superhighway with its slated ports in Kansas City
and Twin Cities running down the middle of the USA with terminuses at
Mexico and Canada. I hear the Texas portion is already being built.


Wish it had been in place 15 years ago. Whomever designed the
freeways to run through big cities was a dummkopf. I can see
connecting them but the designers turned them into bottlenecks.


It was unfortunate genius. Every mystery-Babylonian evil plan has to have built in bribes. The bribe in that case was the commerce the interstate would bring.

It was a great subsidy for the trucking companies. Their lobbyists must have gotten to Ike.


And even if it is being done in the name of a state, it could turn federal at any time. There's little distinction these days between federal and state--nor between public and private partnerships for
that matter.


I think a few more years of home schooling would be a distinct
benefit.


Or just a few more years of "Every child left alone" to develop his genious without Marxist interference through peer pressure oppression.

Marxist interference is the guideline of the NEA and AFT. (The teacher's unions.)

Ya gots to step in early to head off this bull*** where small
towns look at the freeway as a revenue source.


Let's just face up to the real reason, shall we? The Bush family
oil empire is tired of losing revenue to slow driving and they
blame the presence of the local police for their depressed
profits.


I don't think one layer of tinfoil will do the job. I saw some of Coronado's steel helmets the other day. They look pretty sturdy. Maybe you could have a metalsmith craft one for you.


Why don't I just get a Coronado one?


They no longer produce that model. You could try stealing one but
what if the NPS lady has a Glock in her desk?


No wonder our children are so confused:


Mine don't seem confused at all. Neither are my grandchildren and my great-grandchildren are too young to be confused.


On the other hand, it could be better to be confused now than later on in the after life when things didn't work out according to their confident opinions.

You worry about the after life; I have better things to spend my time on.


Mom is too busy shooting the
paranoid for the satanists to raise her very own.


But only if you try to steal some historical artifact.


Why would they care? Are they afraid that I'll discover their historical revisionism?

How would you know it was revised if you haven't heard or seen their historic video?
LZ
.