Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- From: "Frank Howell" <fphowell@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 07:59:46 -0700
bill horne wrote:
MoParMaN wrote:
"bill horne" <redydog@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:JOednZjBIayyyW3ZnZ2dnUVZ_v6dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
MoParMaN wrote:
"Frank Tabor" <ftabor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:a2f0f2hp6qc2mbr4e4e110fc01b0la68au@xxxxxxxxxx
bill horne <redydog@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Bob Giddings wrote:
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:14:49 -0400, bill horne <redydog@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
But hey, a clone *is* a backup. It may take 6 or 7 hours.
But if you can depend on the process working by itself, all
that happens while you sleep.
I've got an 80G disk with about 50G on it. It takes a little
over an hour - but that's across IDE, not USB.
Does Ghost automatically reformat the target disk each time? Or
does it do a file add and replace by date? IOW, does it act in
any way like a backup program, or is it simply a cloner?
It's a cloner, but it will make an image file if you want.
I haven't seen Ghost 9 or 10, so I don't what they might do in
addition to doing their thing from Windows - no dropping to DOS.
They clone a live disk - something some think may be a little
risky. I'll only go to to 9 or 10 if I'm completely unable to
get 2003 to do what I want.
I think Ghost 10 still includes Ghost 2003 as the actual clone
program. Least that's what I think I'm reading on Norton's site.
--
Frank Tabor
Yep and so is 9.0. Generally 9 and 10 are kinda like a one PC
windows executable type program. Point and click for the clueless
as we like to call them...
I don't have a copy to examine, so I can't say "not so" - but I can
say, "I don't think so", with a modicum of confidence.
Norton says:
---------------------------------------------
Includes Norton Ghost 2003 for Windows Me & 98 users
---------------------------------------------
and:
----------------------------------------------
The recovery takes longer than with the DOS-based Ghost 2003
(included in the box for Windows 98/Me machines)
----------------------------------------------
That tells me that Ghost 9 and 10 are not DOS based, but that a
copy of 2003 is included in the box.
PC Mag says:
-------------------------------------------------
Norton Ghost 9.0 is based in large part on PowerQuest's Drive
Image, which Symantec acquired in late 2003
-------------------------------------------------
That tells me that Ghost is not even Ghost anymore. And the few
times I tried Drive Image back in the 90's, I didn't like it,
either.
Until it proves unworkable on my laptop (works just fine on my
desktop), I'm gonna stick with 2003 which contains the original
non-Norton cloning engine. It seems Norton's contribution to the
program was mostly a GUI that starts and finishes the operation in
Windows, but the work is done in DOS with the mostly original Ghost.
I never cared for Norton's stuff, anyway. Down at the computer
store in the 90's, we used to joke that Norton's disk fixer was
just a pretty program that spun the disk, blinked lights, popped up
messages, and then declared the disk fixed. It seldom was fixed,
and we gave up on the program.
Besides, I already have Ghost 2003.
They do include it, on a separate disk. Just as if you purchased both
products separately. It's both in one box. I'm pretty sure I'm
right, as I have them in my hands.
As I said - Ghost 9 and 10 are no longer DOS-based, and they're no
longer Ghost. It's a Windows-based Powerquest Drive Image that's been
fiddled with by Norton.
I may end up having to use it - but not yet.
And Ghost(General Hardware-Oriented Software Transfer) was originally
produced by Binary Research and bought in 1998 and then fiddled with, by
Norton, the other Microsoft.
--
Frank Howell
-----------------
www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed*
Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road
-----------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- From: bill horne
- Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- References:
- Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- From: Bob Giddings
- Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- From: Hunter
- Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- From: Bob Giddings
- Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- From: Kevin W. Miller
- Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- From: Bob Giddings
- Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- From: bill horne
- Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- From: Bob Giddings
- Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- From: bill horne
- Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- From: bill horne
- Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- From: Frank Tabor
- Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- From: MoParMaN
- Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- From: bill horne
- Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- From: MoParMaN
- Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- From: bill horne
- Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- Prev by Date: Re: Bad news from CitiCard.............
- Next by Date: Re: Move Command
- Previous by thread: Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- Next by thread: Re: Files and transfer Cabling
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|