Re: OT Three Years Later
- From: "Lee K" <lee_keedick@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:31:00 -0500
"altar nospam" <altar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:o8gs12lel7n0hf15jc3ljhh6nhhkharmp2@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 23:22:36 -0500, "Lee K" <lee_keedick@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
You don't seem to get that I agreed with you. Slow down, cool off, and
read.
You must suffer from spatial disorientation, since your contention that
"That is incorrect" was in response to my post, not the OP. Pay attention
to where you place your replies.
I don't think so. The thread got all mashed up in the repetitive
process. I responded to only to short paragraph's of the OP. That was
all that was there when I responded. You weren't in sight at the time.
Had you bothered to read anything I've written in the thread since,
you would have gotten the concept that we agreed.
Tom
Since you can't find or don't know what it is that you've written in reply
to whomever, here's the thread starting with OP, my response to the OP, and
then your response to my post, calling it "incorrect":
*************THREAD BEGINS
"altar nospam" <altar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dkqp1214drrr1l9a1d6vi509kvonobltn5@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 20:17:17 -0500, "Lee K" <lee_keedick@xxxxxxxxxxx>*********** ORIGINAL POST
wrote:
"Charles Darnay" <anon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MJSQ9H1938794.8208912037@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
************ MY REPLY TO ORIGINAL POSTFailing to find the weapons of mass destruction fundamental to the
claim that Iraq posed a threat worthy of pre-emption forced President
Bush to offer a new rationalization for the invasion. It was to be the
first step in a grand scheme to spread democracy in the Middle East.
************YOUR REPLY TO MY POSTRepeated revisionist history. Here's this from before the invasion:
"President Bush sketched an expansive vision last night of what he expects
to accomplish by a war in Iraq. Instead of focusing on eliminating weapons
of mass destruction, or reducing the threat of terror to the United
States,
Mr. Bush talked about establishing a 'free and peaceful Iraq' that would
serve as a 'dramatic and inspiring example' to the entire Arab and Muslim
world, provide a stabilizing influence in the Middle East and even help
end
the Arab-Israeli conflict."--editorial, New York Times, Feb. 27, 2003
Full editorial is archived here http://tinyurl.com/adbht
That is incorrect. That was part, albeit small, of his original
justification for going to war. I dislike distortions from either
side.
Tom
Pay attention to where you place your replies, that thread doesn't look "all
mashed up" or "repetitive" at all.
.
- References:
- OT Three Years Later
- From: Charles Darnay
- Re: OT Three Years Later
- From: Lee K
- Re: OT Three Years Later
- From: altar nospam
- Re: OT Three Years Later
- From: Lee K
- Re: OT Three Years Later
- From: altar nospam
- Re: OT Three Years Later
- From: Lee K
- Re: OT Three Years Later
- From: altar nospam
- Re: OT Three Years Later
- From: Lee K
- Re: OT Three Years Later
- From: altar nospam
- OT Three Years Later
- Prev by Date: Re: OT - New Sidearm
- Next by Date: Re: OT - New Sidearm
- Previous by thread: Re: OT Three Years Later
- Next by thread: Re: OT Three Years Later
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
