Re: OT,: Occupational safety

On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 07:22:48 -0500, Lon VanOstran
<RVnFT@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Max wrote:
>
>
>> You brag about your capitalist occupation of junk food peddler; what was
>> your contribution to humanity?
>
>I generated evil profits for the greedy.
>
>> You have the temerity to insult anyone who disagrees with you; calling them
>> liars, accusing them of lacking integrity; have you no understanding of what
>> an opinion is?
>
>I only insult those who keep posting that which has been proven to be
>false. By definition, those are lies. I have no respect for those who
>have no respect for the truth.
>

"the truth"?

There you have it, folks. If this numbskull ever heard anything
anywhere that convinced him that something was "proven to be
false", from then on he feels free to call anybody with a
different opinion a liar. How about that for an objective
"definition"?

Lon, you're an ignorant yahoo. You've proven that to me just
now, so any opinion to the contrary, now and forever, is a lie.

Poor Lon. Apparently you have no respect for yourself.

Life is a true/false test for you. Which you wrote in the 7th
grade. For any question, there is only the clear sweet light of
abiding wisdom, or the despicable gutless evil dishonest
statements of liars. Nothing in between.

Black or white. No room for error. Or, god forbid, doubt.
Nothing to think about. Saves a lot of trouble, doesn't it?

And the rest of us are all definitely out to get you, important
as you are.

Nitwit.


>> As our illustrious <G> Attorney General once said, "Everyone is entitled to
>> their opinion, as ill informed as it might be". Your certainly free to
>> disagree but who the hell are you to call someone a liar when, half the
>> time, you wouldn't know the truth if it hit you over the head.
>
>Don't tell lies, and I won't call you a liar.

Promises, promises.

>
>>
>> My apologies to any others who may be offended by my rant to Lon.
>>
>> Max
>
>I caused you and Giddings to have fits by making a simple observation.
>That being:
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>"Anyone who dies in the act of producing anything, dies as they try to
>make our lives better. The only thing which makes police and fire worker
>different is that their families will be taken care of better than most."
>---------------------------------------------------------------------

No difference, huh? No difference, say, between the guy who
walks in front of a car delivering chewing gum to the Utotem, and
the guy who throws himself on a grenade to save his squad. After
all, they're both trying to "make our lives better".

It's all the same. Plain as black and white.

>
>Now, I must ask why the two of you take offense at that?
>Do you feel as though I owe you something because you chose to be fire
>fighters?
>Do I have some responsibility to treat you as heroes because you made
>that choice?
>I didn't write anything insulting.

O no, of course not. Butter wouldn't melt in your mouth. You
just wrote something stupid. That's all.

>Is it not a fact that the families of police officers and fire fighters
>are better cared for than the families of most others who are killed in
>the line of duty?
>Or are you just pissed off because I value EVERYONE who dies in the line
>of duty?
>
>Lon

Pitiful. You're about as useless as a bucket of warm spit. Go
sit down in the corner.


Bob

www.arcatapet.net/bobgiddings
.

Loading