Re: OT - Must Read
- From: "Bob Hatch" <bobhatch@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:21:14 -0500
"Lindakay" <lindakayallan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1135013979.070575.141760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Bob Hatch wrote:
>
> Those precious sixteen words you love to write about and defend to the
> death: "The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein
> recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa ."
LindaKay, are you aware of the Butler report? Do you know that the Butler
report says, that in fact, after study that the "16" words were "well
founded"? Are you aware that the Intelligence Committee Report from
bi-partisan commission of the US Congress says the same thing? Do you want
the actual words from the Butler Report? Never mind, here they are:
"499. We conclude that, on the basis of the intelligence assessments at the
time, covering both
Niger and the Democratic Republic of Congo, the statements on Iraqi attempts
to buy
uranium from Africa in the Government's dossier, and by the Prime Minister
in the House
of Commons, were well-founded. By extension, we conclude also that the
statement in
President Bush's State of the Union Address of 28 January 2003 that:
The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought
significant quantities of uranium from Africa.
was well-founded."
This is the report from a House of Commons Commission completed in 2004.
>
> He has finally admitted the error of those words because of *faulty
> intelligence*. He has yet to admit that he knew about them being
> faulty prior to using them to use fear as a tool to get into Iraq
> .........
Well, LindaKay, I appears that you don't know what the hell you're talking
about. But that's not a really unusual occurrence. If the House of Commons
and British Intelligence stands by the charge in 2004, how the hell can you
insist he knew them false in 2003?
>
> THOSE lies, Bob. The lies you deny FOR your President, unquestionably
> - blindly and therefore, you are led down the *Primrose Path* of a
> Bush Kingdom. Good for you, I say. That is your choice as a citizen
> of the USA.
Bush Kingdom. Bwahahahahahaha.
>
> However, don't make the mistake you usually impose and tell me that I
> have no *right* to say that.
I've never said that. You have the right to say any thing you want. I've
always said that. Your right to say something does not require my agreement.
In most cases it requires the posting of facts, cuz you're not really very
good at them.
>
> Fact is, I am responsible for questioning any bad decisions that harm
> my country by anyone or it's citizens. Additionally, were I to
> totally ignore Bush's past mistakes, I am doomed to witness him
> repeating them and my country suffering losses of greater
> significance, perhaps. I choose my country and it's citizens over
> Iraq's. As long as my country occupies Iraq, the citizens of my
> country will suffer greater than was originally needed had our
> President not lied.
>
> Who knows? If he had shot a straight line and simply said "Hey,
> ya'll, we're running short of oil and need to go into Iraq to get
> oil. We can take Saddam Hussein, the lying dictator off his throne
> and improve the lives of the Iraqis in the process, How About it?"
> ........or words to that effect, then he may just have gotten the
> deal he construed anyway with lies. Then, that would have been my
> fault - but not now. Not with his lies instead of the truth.
>
> Sorry you're so unsupportive of my rights as an American
Second time in one post you've charged that. Now prove it, or stand as a
liar.
--
"Free enterprise has done more to reduce poverty than
all the government programs dreamed up by
Democrats." --Ronald Reagan
http://www.bobhatch.com
http://www.tdsrvresort.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT - Must Read
- From: Lindakay
- Re: OT - Must Read
- References:
- OT - Must Read
- From: Will Tory
- Re: OT - Must Read
- From: Cliff
- Re: OT - Must Read
- From: Lindakay
- Re: OT - Must Read
- From: Bob Hatch
- Re: OT - Must Read
- From: Lindakay
- OT - Must Read
- Prev by Date: Re: OT Interesting dissection of the argument for torture
- Next by Date: Re: OT Cool Person Test
- Previous by thread: Re: OT - Must Read
- Next by thread: Re: OT - Must Read
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|