Re: OT Disagreement vs brick throwers - was SCOTUS nominee
- From: "Dusty" <RV_phixer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:18:48 -0800
"Alan Balmer" <albalmer@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:i5n1n11cpquvau9b20rg4oau44rovjri8k@xxxxxxxxxx
> On 8 Nov 2005 04:52:49 -0800, "Lindakay" <lindakayallan@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>>I am - thanks - THE REASON? Because I enjoy bringing out the worst in
>>the Neocons here..
>
> By exposing yourself as worse than them? Is that really a good
> tradeoff?
What did you expect, Alan? She's just being "normal" for a member of the
idiot American left. And in large part, because of their sincerity, their
honesty, and their wild public approval ratings, they keep winning all of
the important elections.
Hey! Wait a minute! They've been losing 'em all lately, haven't they?
Makes one wonder why, does it not?
Also, given the spoon-fed DNC approved "RatherGate" style drivel the likes
of which she, Harry, "Air-America," the their "powerful" friends in the MSM
spew day-in and day-out, it's clear that they're getting THEIR message out
and blowing the doors off of the FNC, Rush, O'Reilly, Hannity, and the rest
of what she so charmingly refers to as "stupid neo-cons"...
Hey! Wait another minute! That ain't the way it's working either, is it?
FNC's got more watchers than ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN _combined_! "Air
America" has less listeners than I had from when I was running my own
boot-leg 5-tube superhet transmitter as a kid!
So it should be crystal clear to even the dimmest of us "neocon's" that
they're *winning* on all fronts. Although I'd guess that you'd have to
understand what the specific meaning of "is" is, in order to grasp that
distinction...(:-o)!
Yet they persist on sliming us with their insipid drivel as if it was both
desirable and had legs. They think that everybody out there is as stupid,
clueless and as deeply ignorant as they are. They think that "truth" is
what they all "gang-say" it is. They think that thinking folks--or at least
those sad folks only up to their level of what passes for "thinking"--dote
on the words of the likes of Kennedy, Reid, Pelosi, the DNC, and other such
luminaries of illogic and ignorance.
They haven't yet figured out that nobody that matters listens to them. And
I for one am not inclined to disabuse them of that exceedingly shallow and
sure to be short-lived triumph. Let them warmly wallow in their ignorance
and then loudly (and as often as possible) bray it to the world. It's been
working so well that I'm sure that with just a little more time they'll get
the full measure of their content-free message across to those whom they so
despise...(;-o)!
It's not going to be lost on the mainstay of the American body politic, that
what LK and her cadre of "useful idiots" want for us is *exactly* what the
much admired and deferred to French have earned with their smug, moralistic
superiority out front; and the back-stabbing, self-serving, corruption
behind their thoroughly dishonest backs. Socialism, like stupidity, hasn't
worked to advantage anywhere it's been tried. And it ain't gonna work here,
either. All it can ever do is bankrupt a country's economy and make the
citizens into state slaves. Those that can't deal with freedom and
responsibility *want* to be slaves. After all, it's easier. It takes no
thinking. It needs no personal planning. And it seems to be good, clean
fun as long as you can convince yourself that it's for the best...
So I just keep poking at our resident fools. Although I'm content to let LZ
keep on doing the heavy lifting as he's been doing of late.
L8r all,
Dusty
....
.
- References:
- Re: OT New SCOTUS nominee
- From: Lindakay
- Re: OT New SCOTUS nominee
- From: Bruce
- Re: OT New SCOTUS nominee
- From: Lindakay
- Re: OT New SCOTUS nominee
- From: Bruce
- Re: OT Disagreement vs brick throwers - was SCOTUS nominee
- From: Lindakay
- Re: OT New SCOTUS nominee
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: FBI Monitoring Your Computer And Reading Material re. Patriot Act
- Next by Date: Re: OT: FBI Monitoring Your Computer And Reading Material re. Patriot Act
- Previous by thread: Re: OT Disagreement vs brick throwers - was SCOTUS nominee
- Next by thread: Re: OT Disagreement vs brick throwers - was SCOTUS nominee
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|