Re: OT_ News Reporting By FOX NEWS

MichaelC wrote:
> "Lindakay" <rall1109@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1127844017.377260.123690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > William Boyd wrote:
> > > Albert wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>How can you give a reason for some one doing something when they did
> > > >>not provide that information. You could be correct but by pure
> > > >>conjecture, no one provided such information.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bill,
> > > >
> > > > You are absolutely right, all of my statements were my opinion and
> > > > could be construed to be pure conjecture, that I will admit.
> > > >
> > > > But your statement " Presidents do not lie, their advisory
> > > > information could be flawed or of poor quality,or could be
> > > > incomplete" is no more valid than the statements that I made. Unless
> > > > you have personal knowledge of the inner workings of every
> > > > administration in the history of our country.
> > > >
> > > > About the time this was all taking place it was announced and popular
> > > > science about new technology called "voice stress analysis" by which
> > > > it was said it could be used to determine the validity of a given
> > > > statement by any person, in other words a lie detector test. Another
> > > > thing that came out was a story about "plausible deniability" by the
> > > > president. Which essentially meant that a lot of things that the CIA
> > > > was doing in the world were never shared with the president so that
> > > > when he made a statement he believed it to be true. Therefore he
> > > > could not be accused of lying to the American people using voice
> > > > stress analysis.
> > > >
> > > > I guess we both have different views of the presidency I on the one
> > > > hand look at the office of the presidency as a person that we the
> > > > people decide to administer the business of our government. He is no
> > > > more infallible or in-corruptible than any other American citizen.
> > > > Unlike the military view he is not my "Commander in Chief". As a
> > > > constitution describes it he is commander in chief of the military
> > > > forces of the United States, not the people.
> > > >
> > > > So apparently you have a different view of the stature of the office
> > > > of the presidency, being that you were career military. Again my
> > > > opinion and pure conjecture.
> > > >
> > > > Albert
> > >
> > > NO! You missed the entire slant of my point. You cannot call some
> > > one a liar unless you factually know that. Not just because you do
> > > not believe him. Look at these two statements and see the
> > > difference, "I think he is telling a lie", "He is telling a lie".
> > > Yes I more than likely have a different degree of respect for the
> > > office of the President of the United States. Bit then that respect
> > > extends to all other people, in that I do not accuse an individual
> > > of telling a lie just over my opinion, even though it might appear
> > > as that he did. Foremost, the reasons why a person does or says
> > > something is only known to him. If you check it I think you might
> > > find this to be the American way, at least it was until so many
> > > making comments of people lying, like you came along.
> > > Sorry Albert, that is just my opinion of you.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > BILL P.
> > > Just Dog
> > > &
> > > ME
> >
> > How about "Everone who worked for him who said they quit because he's a
> > liar is tellihng the truth." Does that work? Would you believe more
> > than one person? Or would you believe their former boss?
> > :)
> > Lindakay
>
> Could you take them to a grand jury and get a conviction based on their
> testimony? Seriously. Think about it.
>
> Mike
OK. I'll hold that opinion until there's a set court date. :)

All seriousness, I believe that Paul O'Neill documentation that I'm
still printing and reading from time to time and Richard Clarke's
categorization of the security ineptitudes in the administration are
more correct and not falsified that most people believe. I'm very
careful about authors and reasons for their writing.
I understand the terminology of "sour grapes" and I also realize what
it would cost MS. Rice if she were to admit any wrongdoing that was
printed in Mr. Clarke's book. The parameters are not that difficult to
understand. Deciphering the truth according to times of activities is
the key.
It's sort of like playing Chess and figuring out the moves of a
historical game. I don't have the time currently to do that. I'm
MOVING!! *YAY*
Down the Rapids of Wild black Pavement, I go!!! *YAY*
And the fun part is that NOBODY HAS TO WORK!!! *YAY* But we will
anyway. :)

Later folks.

Thanks for the visit.
The puter is packed for a spare tomorrow. Wi Fi will be my reach.

8:)

Lindakay

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: US shelved evidence discounting Iraqs WMD: report
    ... I've stated my opinion. ... terrorists, ultimately. ... You're a liar. ... More lies from you. ...
    (soc.culture.iraq)
  • Re: OT,: Occupational safety
    ... >I generated evil profits for the greedy. ... different opinion a liar. ... Lon, you're an ignorant yahoo. ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
  • Re: Alienated subjects
    ... isn't necessarily the best liar. ... Their wishes ought to have great weight with him; ... But his unbiased opinion, his mature judgment, his enlightened ... Your representative owes you, not his industry only, ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: Abraham Cherrix freed from court-ordered chemo-poison
    ... I was expressing an opinion. ... Either you are a liar or quite delusional. ... one deserves what they got for being fools. ... Australian Council Against Health Fraud http://www.acahf.org.au ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • Re: OT- Bush Nominates Roberts as Chief Justice
    ... Lindakay wrote: ... > being called names and accused of dishonesty and being a liar - all ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
Loading