Re: Objective Now Clear
- From: The Lone Haranguer <linusz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:12:10 -0500
MichaelC wrote:
In typical fashion, Harry postulates #2 as Clinton's only lie, when his lies under oathHarry wrote:Which lie is worse?
1. I want to president to meet with me. 2. I did not have sex with that women. 3. Saddam has weapons of mass destruction and America is in danger.
It shows a lack of ethical character to "rate" lies, and even a greater lack to accuse someone of lying without evidence.
Hope that helps.
Mike
are the ones that got him impeached.
#1 was merely a ruse for the media.
#3 was furnished by intelligence sources; the same information that Clinton acted on in 1998.
Lesson. Never trust anything posted by Harry. LZ .
- References:
- Objective Now Clear
- From: MichaelC
- Re: Objective Now Clear
- From: Harry
- Re: Objective Now Clear
- From: cj
- Re: Objective Now Clear
- From: MichaelC
- Objective Now Clear
- Prev by Date: Re: Bush seizes chance to make dirty fuel
- Next by Date: Re: Eastern Ontario RV dealers hit by thieves
- Previous by thread: Re: Objective Now Clear
- Next by thread: OT-: Objective Now Clear
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
