Re: Dell's alleged service
- From: Hunter <HHamp5246@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:42:38 -0600
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:15:54 GMT, "Nate"
<nsaptaemcpcrnonf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Not that I think it is right, but I have to agree with Rich. She did get
>two years use out of the laptop. Why should she get the full purchase price
>back? If nothing else, it should be a prorated amount based on the useful
>life of the laptop. Dell probably says the useful life is about two years.
>If that unit cost 2800 bucks two years ago, I would bet the same unit today
>would be close to 600 bucks.
I disagree. She should get another laptop with the exact same stuff
the lost one had on it.
Same size HD, RAM, extras.
Actually, the same would be outdated and much cheaper for Dell today
than back then.
She should get at least the same and spring for upgrades like DVD
burners.
Hunter
http://members.aol.com/hhamp5246/roadtrip2005.htm
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well-preserved body,
but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "...holy ***...what a ride!"
.
- References:
- Dell's alleged service
- From: Jim Corey
- Re: Dell's alleged service
- From: Rich
- Re: Dell's alleged service
- From: Nate
- Dell's alleged service
- Prev by Date: Re: Are there any--->Dave is preaching here too?
- Next by Date: Re: RVers taking scenic route to Wal-Mart
- Previous by thread: Re: Dell's alleged service
- Next by thread: Re: Dell's alleged service
- Index(es):