Re: orange flies
- From: Scott Seidman <namdiesttocs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 May 2006 16:20:14 GMT
rdean3REMOVE@xxxxxxxxx wrote in news:bi6p62588kh6utm89t0tgeo7dfu6s9524p@
4ax.com:
If trout
perceive Florida orange as "Florida blue", it could be calculated how
they would see "Brazilian blue." They wouldn't see Florida orange as a
form of blue and Brazilian orange as some random other color.
Right, to a point. Try not to think of it in terms of shades, but as some
sort of weighting in the activation of photoreceptors. If we have a color
shade that activates our red photoreceptors at 80%, blue at %30, and green
at 10% of maximum activation, we would see a color shade that is mostly
"reddish". If we activate the same photoreceptors at 80%, 30%, and 15%, we
would be able to tell the difference between that and the previous sample,
but it will still be "reddish".
Now, if a person is missing blue receptors, what looks purple to a normal
would look red to the abnormal. The person missing blue receptors has
nothing that would move the color toward blue.
Same for a trout, but we can't "see" the exact same color range the trout
does, so if there is an orange with a heavy UV component, it would look
different to the trout from an orange without that component, but not to
us. We would be like the colorblind person above.
--
Scott
Reverse name to reply
.
- References:
- Re: orange flies
- From: Tom Littleton
- Re: orange flies
- From: Larry L
- Re: orange flies
- From: Willi
- Re: orange flies
- From: Tom Littleton
- Re: orange flies
- From: Willi
- Re: orange flies
- From: rdean3REMOVE
- Re: orange flies
- From: Scott Seidman
- Re: orange flies
- From: Scott Seidman
- Re: orange flies
- From: Tom Nakashima
- Re: orange flies
- From: Scott Seidman
- Re: orange flies
- From: rdean3REMOVE
- Re: orange flies
- Prev by Date: Re: orange flies
- Next by Date: Re: orange flies
- Previous by thread: Re: orange flies
- Next by thread: Re: orange flies
- Index(es):