Re: five-point political agenda
- From: rw <rw56_to_the_chase@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:23:34 -0600
David Snedeker wrote:
"Tim J." <NOkpos3wtSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:w5adnVt0NYicpdHZnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
rw wrote:
What could have persuaded people to vote for this transparently
loathsome creep?
The other two even more transparently loathsome creeps? Just a guess. .
.
--
TL,
Tim
---------------------------
No. Near as I can figure many of the Bush voters like to play dress-up. So
when Bush staged the landing on the carrier, after having the carrier turn
so the camera shots were seaward, and did the costume change to the leather
jacket, it spoke directly to that part of the pocket-poolsters that prefer
dress-up to real life people with real life experiences like Kerry and Max
Cleland.
I have to believe that the people who still approve of Bush, despite the abundant evidence of his bumbling incompetence and mendacity, are the people who wouldn't mind if he ate their children.
--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: five-point political agenda
- From: David Snedeker
- Re: five-point political agenda
- From: Dave LaCourse
- Re: five-point political agenda
- References:
- five-point political agenda
- From: rw
- Re: five-point political agenda
- From: Mr. Opus McDopus
- Re: five-point political agenda
- From: rw
- Re: five-point political agenda
- From: Mark F.
- Re: five-point political agenda
- From: daytripper
- Re: five-point political agenda
- From: rw
- Re: five-point political agenda
- From: Tim J.
- Re: five-point political agenda
- From: David Snedeker
- five-point political agenda
- Prev by Date: Re: five-point political agenda
- Next by Date: Re: five-point political agenda
- Previous by thread: Re: five-point political agenda
- Next by thread: Re: five-point political agenda
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading