Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- From: "Bill McKee" <bmckeespam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 05:00:00 GMT
"rw" <rw56_to_the_chase@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fkbef.1622$s14.1439@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Bill McKee wrote:
>>
>> That is because Clinton was lucky. Lucky in that he had a Republican
>> Congress that actually controlled the spending for a couple of years, and
>> the huge dot.bomb bust that cranked up a huge amount of surplus money to
>> the Fed's.
>
> If I have to choose between a lucky, intelligent, involved, popular,
> randy-assed President and, well, lets just say someone the opposite,
> that's an easy choice.
>
> BTW, I see that those Republicans are doing a phenomenally shitty job of
> controlling spending now that they've controlled both houses of Congress
> and the Presidency for the past five years. Somehow, I feel it must be
> Clinton's fault, but I can't figure out exactly how.
>
> --
> Cut "to the chase" for my email address.
Clinton was a failure in my book, just because he had the charisma,
intelligence etc. to make some great fundamental changes. We still have
base line budgeting, amendments to bills do not have to be germane to the
bills, he did nothing concrete about the terrorism attacks during his 8
years. We need to vote out the legislators we now have, a clean sweep.
Both the Republicans and the Democrats have not met a spending bill they did
not like or add pork to. And Bush? Where is the veto? Clinton tried to
run the Federal business just like the single party Arkansas state business.
Does not work that way. And the randyness. You are the CEO of the country.
You do not fool around with the company employees, and at least fat, ugly
employees. Kennedy, at least picked good looking women not in his employ.
And you forget the original investigation was on a probably crooked real
estate deal. Intelligence may be over rated for POTUS. Carter was probably
the smartest POTUS we have had, and he had both an ineffective Presidency,
and part of his legacy is the terrorism we now have. When Iranian's could
take captive our embassy staff with no repercussions, we birthed the modern
terrorism movement.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- From: Conan The Librarian
- Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- From: rw
- Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- References:
- Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- From: Johnson
- Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- From: rw
- Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- From: gary
- Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- From: vincent p . norris
- Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- From: Bill McKee
- Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- From: rw
- Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- Prev by Date: Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- Next by Date: Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- Previous by thread: Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- Next by thread: Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- Index(es):