Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert

Bill McKee wrote:

That is because Clinton was lucky. Lucky in that he had a Republican Congress that actually controlled the spending for a couple of years, and the huge dot.bomb bust that cranked up a huge amount of surplus money to the Fed's.

If I have to choose between a lucky, intelligent, involved, popular, randy-assed President and, well, lets just say someone the opposite, that's an easy choice.

BTW, I see that those Republicans are doing a phenomenally shitty job of controlling spending now that they've controlled both houses of Congress and the Presidency for the past five years. Somehow, I feel it must be Clinton's fault, but I can't figure out exactly how.

--
Cut "to the chase" for my email address.
.

Quantcast