Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- From: "Bill McKee" <bmckeespam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:59:02 GMT
"vincent p. norris" <vpn1@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qh3gn1psvd9ac8pkhdpn6gpcbep4bemv35@xxxxxxxxxx
> >The economy is important too.
>
> Forbes Magazine said, a couple of years ago, that Clinton had the best
> economic record of any president since WW II.
>
> I don't suppose you remember a guy named Forbes who wanted to be the
> REPUBLICAN candidate for the Presidency a few years ago.
>
> vince
That is because Clinton was lucky. Lucky in that he had a Republican
Congress that actually controlled the spending for a couple of years, and
the huge dot.bomb bust that cranked up a huge amount of surplus money to the
Fed's.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- From: Johnson
- Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- From: rw
- Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- From: gary
- Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- From: vincent p . norris
- Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- Prev by Date: Re: Xmas Fishing Camera
- Next by Date: Re: Short vacation
- Previous by thread: Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- Next by thread: Re: Selling off national forest and national parks? TU alert
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|