Re: Yet two more time wasters...
- From: "Wolfgang" <wolfgang@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:08:57 -0500
"riverman" <myronbuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1128007075.746673.307830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Here's a couple. I bet this one fools ya:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/dz3zq
Fooled me. Stopping to think about it for a moment afterwards provides one
of those "DOH!" moments.
> ...and enjoy this one. It amazes me, and I'm not all that easily
> amazed.
>
> http://y.20q.net/anon
It took 26 questions to correctly identify a scalpel. We disagreed on the
correct answers to five questions:
1. Can you use it at school? I said yes......the machine says no.
2. Can you get information by using it? I said probably....the machine says
no.
3. Is it something you bring along? I said yes.....the machine says no.
4. Is it dangerous? I said depends.....the machine says yes.
5. Does it require specific knowledge to use it? I said no.....the machine
says yes.
Wolfgang
who, for the nonce, will continue to do his own dissections. :)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Yet two more time wasters...
- From: opie
- Re: Yet two more time wasters...
- From: opie
- Re: Yet two more time wasters...
- From: Scott Seidman
- Re: Yet two more time wasters...
- References:
- Yet two more time wasters...
- From: riverman
- Yet two more time wasters...
- Prev by Date: Re: Scottish Fly Fisher on MSN
- Next by Date: Re: Yet two more time wasters...
- Previous by thread: Yet two more time wasters...
- Next by thread: Re: Yet two more time wasters...
- Index(es):