Re: Professor Goldstein
- From: Joey Goldstein <joegold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:21:42 -0800 (PST)
On Nov 12, 11:11 am, Joey Goldstein <joeg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 12, 7:01 am, LJS <ljsche...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 12, 2:22 am, Joey Goldstein <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
lol Now I understand. Your conception of analysis is to change the
music to fit your way of thinking! Wow. Now that is innovative
thinking!
Oh, by the way, how did your re-release of the cut do? It must have
become a real hit after you made the corrections.
LJS
Look. I made a mistake.
I admitted it and I corrected it in my analysis.
I'm sure you'll try to use this to spin some tale of me over the years
as being an evil incompetent, just like you've used the professor bit.
But everyone here knows what you're doing.
It's interesting to me that of the two posts I made last night you
decided to respond to this one with another personal attack rather
than the other one where the actual musical discussion is occurring.
But at least it's not 17 paragraphs long.
Thanks.
.
- References:
- Professor Goldstein
- From: Joey Goldstein
- Re: Professor Goldstein
- From: LJS
- Re: Professor Goldstein
- From: Joey Goldstein joegold AT primus DOT ca (I never use my yahoo email account)
- Re: Professor Goldstein
- From: LJS
- Re: Professor Goldstein
- From: Joey Goldstein joegold AT primus DOT ca
- Re: Professor Goldstein
- From: LJS
- Re: Professor Goldstein
- From: Joey Goldstein joegold AT primus DOT ca
- Re: Professor Goldstein
- From: LJS
- Re: Professor Goldstein
- From: Daniel Schorr
- Re: Professor Goldstein
- From: Joey Goldstein
- Re: Professor Goldstein
- From: LJS
- Re: Professor Goldstein
- From: Joey Goldstein
- Professor Goldstein
- Prev by Date: Re: Professor Goldstein
- Next by Date: Re: Professor Goldstein
- Previous by thread: Re: Professor Goldstein
- Next by thread: Re: Professor Goldstein
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|