negative scales
- From: neo geo <geozipper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:56:32 -0800 (PST)
A favorite technique of mine is to devise my own scales. Usually it
involves working out a series of steps on the keyboard, counting &
numbering.
This process isn’t unusual since there is a mathematical component to
music. And the very basis of math is counting & the idea of a number
line.
There is also a correlation between the visual arts & music. Terms
such as density, color, proportion & composition come to mind. In the
“Essentials of Music” thread, Steve Latham’s ideas led to the
proposition of their visual equivalent: 3 planes of depth in
perspective, a foreground, middle ground, background.
I’ve realized that recently I, too, have taken a concept from the
visual arts & applied it to my scale designs (I am a visual artist,
having shows of my works & sketching almost daily).
The term “negative space” is the empty space left over in a drawing
once all the fore & middle ground shapes are blocked in. In the same
way, lately I’ve been considering the “left over” notes of any scale I
design, the notes not in the scale itself.
I recognize the value of this when applied to the hexatonic scales I
spoke of in a prior post. The “negative” of any hexatonic scale would
be the remaining 6 notes of the octave, meaning these scales & their
negative scales lend themselves readily to dodecaphony & the 12-tone
technique. (Two weeks ago I recorded a piano improvisation that used
a hexatonic scale & its negative scale, as two tonal centers.)
Similarly, the scale I devised of increasing half steps
C - Db - Eb - F# - Bb - C
when continued past the interior octave, gives an unexpected result:
C - Db - Eb - E - F# - G - A - Bb - C
This is a jazz scale I learned 20 years ago from an artist friend Ray
DiCecco. As such, it made it plain to me that there was some rational
explanation - - the mathematics behind this scale - - other than
simply being someone’s whimsy of creation.
I was surprised to see these increasing half steps formulate a
definite scale since I assumed at some point ALL the 12 notes would be
touched upon as I proceeded up the keyboard. Instead, after 24 steps
the entire sequence started again, always missing 4 notes:
D - F - G# - B
This is where the negative scale kicks into view: those 4 left over
notes are of course one of the 3 diminished 7th chords (diminished
7ths are built on successive 3rds and so start over on fourth half
step).
Since there are only 3 diminished 7th chord patterns, their negative
(this 8 note jazz scale) also would only have 3 positions before
repeating. (The Eb position yields the same notes as the C position.)
Furthermore, the jazz scale already incorporates 2 known diminished
7th chord patterns, so including the scale’s negative, facilitates the
3rd diminished chord & completes the cycle.
These interrelations of positive & negative scales & how they
correlate to known chords seem to be fertile ground for composition.
Anytime we recognize correlations & see how previously disparate
elements interrelate, creativity is sparked. And as we explore these
areas & our brains map out new connections between territories, we
tend to gain a deeper insight into our practice.
After envisioning positive & negative scales, I’m wondering what would
be a good musical indicator for the concept of zero? Besides
silence, of course.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: negative scales
- From: Neil
- Re: negative scales
- From: Steve Latham
- Re: negative scales
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: negative scales
- From: tom_k
- Re: negative scales
- Prev by Date: Re: Progession "generators"
- Next by Date: Re: "essentials" of music
- Previous by thread: You're a bunch of foolish, foolish people
- Next by thread: Re: negative scales
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|