Re: OT Pa. Man Fires Cannonball Into Neighbor's House

On Sep 8, 1:31 am, mysterytenor <edop...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 8, 1:26 am, Richergar <richer...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



It's a fascinating discussion.

I believe that animals do 'think'. Not all of them, and not all
equally well, but I do believe that some species pretty clearly think,
and that within a species, for example,
dogs or cats, there are real differences of ability and temperment. I
believe that, in fact, there is a fair amount of opinion in the
community that is not different than mine - several decades ago, the
recieved wisdom was that they did not think. To think means to think a
thought, to hold a thought in one's mind, and I believe that animals
can obviously experience longings and desires and hold simple thought
about them. Certainly animals can experience 'feelings' or affects. It
may be much more complex for dolphins, whales, and some land species.

I do doubt that animals can comprehend certain things - for example, I
don't think that animals can comprehend 'beauty' in the way we can at
least, and I don't think that for the most part animals have self-
consciousness, although I am not so sure about primates. I don't think
a dog or a primate ever thought "Am I beautiful?"  or 'Is the female
who is rutting attractive?"

Do remember that aliens coming to Earth and observing us might very
well say that all we had were stimulus-response gradients. Do also
remember that if you spoke in the 50s to a Skinnerian, he or she would
say that we have no minds or thoughts, and that we are simply patterns
of operant conditioning.

There is also a notion of 'mind' that I don't think we fully
understand, but which in my view also applies. If you look at an ant
colony or bee colony or even a settlement of prairie dogs, you get a
sense that there is a governing 'mind' that is represented by the
colony...otherwise there is really no way to explain the phenomena.
There is no way to understand these kinds of social organizations
other than through something that says that the 'colony' is really the
entity.

Best

On Sep 7, 6:54 pm, Mack A. Damia <mybaconbu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:17:06 -0700, "EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque)"

<evgm...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Mack A. Damia wrote:

Read an interesting book a couple of years ago, Julian Jaynes, *The
Origins of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind* .
Theory claims that at one time - not too long ago (prior to, say, 3000
BC, we had a bicameral mind consisting of a schizoprenic "God" side
and a man side".  We acted and behaved on and from voices from the God
side, and we really didn't possess consciousness as we know it today.
Some scholars believe that consciousness is a function of language,

Perhaps you should define "consciousness".  Most animals - certainly all
mammals - are capable of feeling pain (although there was a time when
many veterinarians denied it).  I'm not sure they entirely "live in an
eternal now", as was once believed, either.  (Most of the family cats
and dogs I've known had enough capacity to recognize the passing of time
so that they "knew" when their owners were due home, and would be
waiting to greet their return.)  Many of them also exhibit surprising
ability to reason, when it comes to accomplishing something they want to
do (especially if we prefer they NOT do it)!  However, although many
pets do make sounds to communicate, I don't think it can really be
considered "language".

Is your name really "Gamble"?

My last name is Procter.  We could go into partnership and make soap
or something.

In response to your question, animals are not conscious of themselves
or conscious of their mortality.  This is one of the major differences
between humans and animals.

That's what "consciousness" means in my terminology: aware of one's
mortality.

Why do dogs chase cars?  Roadkill?  They have no idea because they are
not conscious of themselves and the dangers that they expose
themselves to.

Animals may "sense" when death is near, but they are not conscious of
it.  Elephants may go to a special site to die - but it's purely
instinct within their frames of reference - where they live and the
behaviors of others.

Certainly they feel pain, but they don't know how to avoid pain -
unless they get to sense that a rolled up newspaper is going to result
in a swat on the nose or rump.  Stimulus - response.

Pets get a "sense" of their owners and their owner's habits, but it's
not "consciousness"  as we know it. They have a rough biological clock
that lets them know when they are hungry or tired or when their owners
are going to return.  They can recognize certain sounds, too - they
have ears and necessary organs - but they are not conscious  - it's
more stimulus -response.  We used to have a dog that would run and
hide when we said, "bath".  It was just a sound to the dog who
associated it with a rather unpleasant experience as for as she was
concerned.  Stimulus - response.

No, animals cannot reason; reason is a condition requiring
consciousness as we know it.  Again, if animals could reason, dogs
wouldn't chase cars in traffic.

It's stimulus - response and "sensing".

I don't like to force my thoughts, but I've been through this in
graduate philosophy courses, and this is the accepted wisdom.  To me,
it makes sense.  You have a perfect right to think otherwise!

Cheers!
--
mad- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I know my young cat thinks, and she proves it every day, many times a
day. She's a very intelligent 10 month old cat. I don't think it's
instinct when she nudges me with her paw while I am sitting at the
computer. She has learned that doing this almost always gets the
response of me either feeding her some treats, or going to the kitchen
to watch her eat some nibbles. She seems to like it when I watch her
eat, and say nice things to her, as she eats more. If I leave the
kitchen, she usually stops eating.

Ed, who is also learning from his cat

Best,
Ed

Our oldest dog, a rottie/shepherd mix, definitely can do some
sequential problem-solving, particularly when getting access to food
is in the bargain! Our middle dog, a lab/beagle mix, loves to fold
large doggie beds over on themselves in order to double the cushion
thickness. Our third dog is a three-legged spaniel mix, and we're
pretty much happy that he's able to get around.
Best,
Ken
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Casting a parent class to a child class
    ... a Cat to an Animal. ... When you cast it back to the original type, your view changes and you get to ... those things that Cats share with all other Animals. ... along with new default Dog parts. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: Casting a parent class to a child class
    ... I think I've now understood what a cast is ... from a Cat to an Animal. ... those things that Cats share with all other Animals. ... somehow populated with the Animal parts, along with new default Dog parts. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: OT Pa. Man Fires Cannonball Into Neighbors House
    ... I don't think they have a mind as we think of a mind - otherwise, ... My Dad was devoted to our dog and she devoted to him, ... I believe that animals do 'think'. ... Origins of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind*. ...
    (rec.music.opera)
  • Re: OT ~ The Dog, The Cat, and The Rat! Mortal Enemies?
    ... them rigged a harness up for his cat so she wouldn't have to walk so ... much (like the dog and himself). ... At some juncture the rat came along, ... Like the Mayor, the animals are drugged. ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
  • Re: Ellens puppy sob story
    ... |>>dog, while some teenagers are uninterested in the family dog. ... I adopted a cat about nine years ago, picking an adult that was to be ... It also said that if the shelter ... these shelters complain about all the unplaced animals and their need ...
    (rec.arts.tv)
Loading