Re: LT's Google Ratings - An RMO Survey

On May 16, 12:31 pm, "CH.Post Tracker and Counter"
<CH.Post.Trac...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 15, 10:27 pm, LT.Post.Trac...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:



To RMO Members:

I'll be frank with you. When I took this job I figured it might take
about fifteen minutes per week on average - max! How was I supposed to
know that I was going to work for the Posting Master of the Universe?

I mean - look - here we are at May 15 and he's already up to 568
posts.

568 posts!!

And to make matters worse his rating is at rock-bottom - one star! Do
you realize that one star is lower than NO STARS?!? Incredible! 'No
stars' just signifies indifference. But 'one star' is a proactive
considered negative opinion requiring that you maneuver your shaky
cursor spang on top of that tiny star and left-click it before it
falls off. It means "I wouldn't recommend this post to anybody - even
my enemies".

Now, I will admit to the possibility that LT's dismal rating could be
caused by a Google Glitch, albeit a vanishingly remote possibility.
Google has ignored my pleas for a recount. So, the only practical way
of clearing the air (so to speak) is to conduct a 'manual' survey to
put this ratings mess to bed.

Getting to your part in this, all you have to do is answer a simple
question - or just ignore it.

Question: If you think LT's posts deserve an average rating of two
stars or greater please write the number in this space: _________.

If you think LT's posts are correctly rated at a dismal one star,
simply ignore the question.

I will tally up the results and announce them on Sunday unless I am
struck by lightning before then.

[Note: RMO has 1182 subscribers through Google and an unknown number
of readers through other portals.]

LT.Post.Tracker

Hey, great idea! I'm gonna do one for my guy Handelman. Your boy
Tillman is up to 600 posts for May already, and Handelman is only at
433. But what you have to keep in mind is that Handelman's posts are
very long on average, like huge gasbags, whereas Tillman's are
relatively brief, like quick but intense farts. What this means is
that I have to wade through a lot more *** than you do. Even so, I
wouldn't want to trade places with you.
Best,
CH.Post.Tracker - By the way, do you mind if I use your survey for my
template?

Be my guest.
LT.Post.Tracker
.

Loading