Re: furtwaengler
- From: The Scarlet Parsnip <The_Scarlet_Parsnip@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 19:30:56 GMT
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:42:53 -0000, Jaquandor <jaquandor@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Oct 3, 12:42 pm, The Scarlet Parsnip
<The_Scarlet_Pars...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:23:38 -0000, El Klauso <Klau...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
As to the smaller issues of thematic memorability and integrity, I
find the song-full and often present folk-like nature of Mahler's
material not only lagely satisfactory and pleasing on a moment-to-
moment basis, but also quite capable of sustaining the immense
structures placed upon them by the composer.
Don't like him.
Nobody said you had to! I love Mahler and his epic sensibility -- his
symphonies are the musical equivalent of, say, a Trollope or Tolstoy
novel. Yes, long-winded, but never to me a waste.
I'm not as big a fan of Bruckner, though.
Nobody said that I couldn't express my dislike for 'em, buster.
I actually REALLY dislike him.
I like Blade Runner better.
So, in the words of that great philospher A.A. Milne:
Tiddily Pom!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: furtwaengler
- From: Jaquandor
- Re: furtwaengler
- References:
- Re: furtwaengler
- From: Jaquandor
- Re: furtwaengler
- From: The Scarlet Parsnip
- Re: furtwaengler
- From: three-eyed freak
- Re: furtwaengler
- From: The Scarlet Parsnip
- Re: furtwaengler
- From: three-eyed freak
- Re: furtwaengler
- From: The Scarlet Parsnip
- Re: furtwaengler
- From: El Klauso
- Re: furtwaengler
- From: The Scarlet Parsnip
- Re: furtwaengler
- From: Jaquandor
- Re: furtwaengler
- Prev by Date: Re: Blade Runner- HOLY #!%!!!!
- Next by Date: Re: Blade Runner- HOLY #!%!!!!
- Previous by thread: Re: furtwaengler
- Next by thread: Re: furtwaengler
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|