Re: Will the real Tulio Prego please stand up

snavoyosky@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Ventura wrote:

snavoyo...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hint: Why not go through each and every Google member post and compare
that "footprint" ? <g>

<snip>

Cynical now about the declination of the Giulietti Corporation?
Resentment, bellicose, vindictiveness, ridicule, contempt, slander,
name calling, and all those things you hate about Tom, you now have
portrayed yourself this way toward me. I guess that makes you a troll
too and that I should finally heed the words of my emails to ignore
you.


Veb=ntura is a gentleman. Tom is a swine. Convicted by his own words. I don't have to read your nattering about Giulietti to know that you have lost your mind.

Tom sees you as you really are. You make big words about subjects you
know little about and when confronted about them, you disappear without
rebuttal.

Tom does not deserge a reply. He is a foul-mouthed individual who would like to make waves, but can't even get arrested. In my case the only reason is for replying that ignoring him does not make him shut up.

You've been after me for a long time, Ventura, but no more because I
am going to take the advice and ignore you. You can rave and rant all
you want to the masses and I won't be listening. As several here have
stated: "PLONK"

Plonk me too while you are at it. It won't stop me from criticizing you.


Take these under consideration, the latter from Ted Kloba and I thank
him for his prudent research.

"This line is added to the header of a posted article by the server.
The contents of the header is either the IP address or the fully
qualified domain name of the client host posting the article. The fully
qualified domain name should be determined by doing a reverse lookup in
the DNS on the IP address of the client. If the client article contains
this line, it is removed by the server before acceptance of the article
by the Usenet transport system.

This header provides some idea of the actual host posting the article
as opposed to information in the Sender or From lines that may be
present in the article. This is not a fool-proof methodology since
reverse lookups in the DNS are vulnerable to certain types of spoofing,
but such discussions are outside the scope of this document."

Theodore M. Kloba wrote:
snavoyosky@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
But that is NOT my IP which is given. My IP begins with 192...and I
only use this Apple.

192 is a private network IP address. It has nothing to do with the internet. Read any book on networking. The IP address of Tulio was not only the same as yours, but the message to W.D. was obviously from you and had his return email address on it. This guy is staying in your house?

I wasn't following this thread to know exactly what's going on, but a
small technical note: if the IP address you're referring to starts with
192.168... then it's a "private" address between your computer and
your ISP, and it never reaches the internet at-large. There's another
address used between your ISP and the outside world.

See this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_IP_address


Ciao Ventura. PLONK!
-- Stephen J. Navoyosky

SNAVOYOSKY@xxxxxxxxxx

.