Re: H2 Review
- From: "Chickenhead" <kuNOrtSPAMshapTHANKiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 14:42:55 -0800
Which tune is it? There's a whole bunch on the page.
Hey, if it sounds better at 192 .mp3, it'd probably be great for post-processing at 24-bit .wav.
<rpjazzguitar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:67d4209f-c300-4efa-920a-21d846ab6f7e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default.cfm?bandID=562588
I recorded another jam tonight. This time, I used the H2. Mp3 at 192.
Plug in power on. No compression or limiting. And, I plugged in the
Sony ECMDS70P. I had the input sensitivity in the medium position.
I included a few extra seconds at the end so you can hear the hiss
level.
I think it's better, although to be thorough I need to try the
internal mics at the middle sensitivity setting.
Forgive the playing, though. The trumpet player had never played this
tune and was transposing in his head as he read the chart for the
first time. That's in addition to the usual difficulties.
.
- References:
- H2 Review
- From: rpjazzguitar
- Re: H2 Review
- From: Chickenhead
- Re: H2 Review
- From: rpjazzguitar
- Re: H2 Review
- From: Chickenhead
- Re: H2 Review
- From: rpjazzguitar
- Re: H2 Review
- From: Chickenhead
- Re: H2 Review
- From: rpjazzguitar
- Re: H2 Review
- From: Chickenhead
- Re: H2 Review
- From: rpjazzguitar
- Re: H2 Review
- From: Chickenhead
- Re: H2 Review
- From: rpjazzguitar
- Re: H2 Review
- From: Chickenhead
- Re: H2 Review
- From: rpjazzguitar
- Re: H2 Review
- From: Chickenhead
- Re: H2 Review
- From: rpjazzguitar
- Re: H2 Review
- From: Chickenhead
- Re: H2 Review
- From: rpjazzguitar
- H2 Review
- Prev by Date: Re: online fake book / standards book?
- Next by Date: Re: H2 Review
- Previous by thread: Re: H2 Review
- Next by thread: Re: H2 Review
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|