Re: Giant steps

dougwamble@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Nice try, Tom.

I was referring to the emails that were sent to me with YOUR IP address
under the fake name. You remember those, don't you? I did in fact
email you in response to those emails. The ones where you continued,
in graphic detail, the original things you said on here regarding my
family. Or maybe the meds have caused you to forget those emails...

I have never emailed you under my name or any other name. And if you
did receive email that you thought was from me, then why did you
repeatedly email me complaining that I wasn't responding to you?

..

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Giant steps
    ... I was referring to the emails that were sent to me with YOUR IP address ... under the fake name. ... email you in response to those emails. ... joegold AT sympatico DOT ca ...
    (rec.music.makers.guitar.jazz)
  • Re: Snits delusions grow even bigger...
    ... The BS is flowing thick in this thread now. ... Considering the above - in your response to John (where he was ... speaking about *you*) who do you say you were referring to: ... you don't know what the word insinuate ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Great SWT Program
    ... Determining their worst-case attacks ... It's just that my own response was to the ... the quoted part you seem to have been referring to was ... still part of the "long digression". ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: Ok, I really dont mean to harp
    ... indirectly, or even by accident, it was referring to me. ... responded with "it proves stupidity is infectious". ... response. ...
    (alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers)
  • Re: Snits delusions grow even bigger...
    ... The BS is flowing thick in this thread now. ... Considering the above - in your response to John (where he was clearly ... speaking about *you*) who do you say you were referring to: ... John talked about you... ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
Loading