Re: SRM 350
- From: Misifus <rafseibert@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:19:07 -0500
Sherm wrote:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:07:49 -0500, walkinay@xxxxxx (hank alrich)
wrote:
Sherm <wheezer1024@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Aug 2008 19:28:13 GMT, "Ray Boyce"Then I think I don't understand the problem. Does the mixer have only
At that point it becomes entertaining to watch their face as I mute theI use 2 of the the 350s but I've had a similar experience with my
signal just to the monitor and it all goes away for them, and they still
hear the house but they realize just how much they were hearing in the
wedges... They couldn't tell it was so clean.... Then comes the oh... ok...
never mind....
little SRM150 monitor. That's a great little product, imo.
I think Charlie's gotta deal with the fact that they already own
passive mains and monitors --- needs to build on that.
two power amplifier output channels? Can they use one for mono mains and
another for mono mons? Can the mixer feed different mixes to each amp
channel?
I saw him on Sunday and it sounds like the pa head is as basic as can
be --- 4 channels, no sends, mono output. They have 3 voices and 3
guitars and, necessity being the mother of invention, they sub-mix
guitars in a little 4 channel behringer and put that into one channel
of the pa head while the other 3 channels get the mics.
Charlie's had this little trio going for a while now .... time to jam
a crowbar in the old wallets ... :-)
Sherm
Sounds to me like they could use a board with a few more inputs than even yours, Jeff. For some reason, there's a break point at four mic inputs. There are a lot with that number, and then it's a bit of a jump up to the next level in input channels, whether powered or unpowered.
-Raf
--
Misifus-
Rafael Seibert
mailto:rafseibert@xxxxxxx
blog: http://rafsrincon.blogspot.com/
Photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/rafiii
home: http://www.rafandsioux.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SRM 350
- From: Sherm
- Re: SRM 350
- References:
- SRM 350
- From: Al Evans
- Re: SRM 350
- From: Sikora Family
- Re: SRM 350
- From: Sherm
- Re: SRM 350
- From: Sikora Family
- Re: SRM 350
- From: Ray Boyce
- Re: SRM 350
- From: Sherm
- Re: SRM 350
- From: hank alrich
- Re: SRM 350
- From: Sherm
- SRM 350
- Prev by Date: Re: SRM 350
- Next by Date: Re: SRM 350
- Previous by thread: Re: SRM 350
- Next by thread: Re: SRM 350
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading