Re: Go Neil!
- From: "Paul L" <kbtrans@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:22:20 -0600
"Daniel Nestlerode" <dnestler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:HNOdnX1HtNFLLRrVnZ2dnUVZ_orinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10787_3-9997977-60.html?tag=bl
NY asks techies for a higher quality music file compression form.
Go Neil!
Daniel
Neil has always been a champion for sound quality. The
problem is, The Consumer does not share his sentiment.
He really liked DVD Audio. Nobody bought in ... at
least not in the numbers that make it a viable medium.
The way we listen to music these days, the sound
quality of mp3 sampled at a 320 rate vs. the original
wav files is indistinguishable. I still have a "listening room"
where there is a definate audible difference between
CDs (and LPs) vs. mp3 but that is not the norm these days.
I'm guessing if there is a driving force in music compression
research, it's to make our music take up even less space that
it does now and maintaining the same quality would be
acceptable in the marketplace.
cheers
Paul
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Go Neil!
- From: Larry Pattis
- Re: Go Neil!
- Prev by Date: IKEA sold a Chinese made Guitar - Ever seen one?
- Next by Date: Re: Hotel California fingerpicking ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Go Neil!
- Next by thread: Re: Go Neil!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
