Re: Ping: Absolutely Everyone!!

Misifus <rafseibert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:6abuljF36jfl1U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

John Sorell wrote:
Misifus <rafseibert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:6ab76iF365788U1
@mid.individual.net:

Chuck wrote:
Norman Draper wrote:
If you are in the Inner Circle, want to be in the Inner Circle, or
want to know if it's real .... LOLOL!!

If any of the above refers to you, drop me an email with your REAL
email address included so that I can contact you.

It's your chance to finally be on the inside...... :-)

Remember: email me. Responses on here won't be answered......


Norman (The Game Is Afoot!!) Draper

Hmmm ... sorry Norm but I think I'm going to start using an alias
name and a bogus e-mail address. There's (or is it theirs) too
many nosey people just waiting to look into my personal biz!
Since you raise the question, it's "There're" (plural and all that,
you know)

-Raf



I don't think There're is a *legal* contraction. He will just have to
put forth the supreme effort of typing there are.

Where are the spelling police?

John


I think it's as *legal* as "There's". Both are analogous
contractions.

-Raf


Ah! That looks *more correct*.

John
.