Re: OT: Go vote

Misifus25/1/06 8:50 PM

> I'm trying to get this straight, are you saying that what hit the
> Pentagon was not a high-jacked civilian airliner? Or, that it's
> possible that it was not such an airliner?

Yes.

The official line is that a 757 airliner - piloted by a terrorist hit the
Pentagon at near ground level and at nearly 500 mph.

The actual damage to the Pentagon building was nothing like that. A Boeing
757 is a huge airliner, 40 feet high on the tarmac and 100 + feet long. It
has a massive wing span (filled with aviation fuel) and high tail section.

The hole in the building seen in the news pics of a smouldering building was
consistent with something very much smaller impacting it. Some experts have
suggested possible a small aircraft or possibly a Tomahawk Cruise Missile.

No photographs exist of an impact; no photographs exist of a plane crashed
into the building; no video footage from the many security cameras of the
approach and impact of the plane/missile or whatever was available - having
all been removed by the FBI. All sides of the Pentagon were camera
monitored 24/7 remember.

It casts severe doubts on the truth of this. There are many more
indictments and evidential factors involved which have been examined by
aircraft crash investigators and point to the official line being bull***.
But if you want more stuff go to the original sources - they are all freely
available. It is very disturbing and alarming.

Where the Pentagon was hit in the assault of 9/11/01 is without question: a
portion of the building's west block which was undergoing an extensive
renovation. Despite the interesting implications of this fact, it has been
eclipsed by the ongoing controversy among sceptics of the official story by
questions of what caused the damage - controversy spawned by the lack of
public evidence about the Pentagon attack, and mysteries surrounding the
fate of Flight 77, the Boeing 757 that's supposed to have hit the Pentagon.

Absent from the public record are photographs or videos of anything like a
757 approaching the Pentagon. Photographs taken immediately after the crash
show that neither large pieces nor significant quantities of wreckage
remained outside the building. The idea that nearly all the remains of the
80-ton aircraft disappeared into the building strikes many people as
problematic because the punctured walls of the initial damage to the
building do not include regions where the ends of the wings and the vertical
tail section would have impacted, nor do they show signs of scoring by these
parts.

To some observers, the lack of obvious crash debris outside the building
following the attack, the lack of an impact impression closely matching the
profile of a 757, and the suppression of videos and photographs that may
have shown the approach of the attack plane and its remains inside the
building were red flags indicating that the attack involved some entirely
different type of aircraft, or no aircraft at all.

Don't take my word on this... Do some research on this, it is interesting.

CR


.

Loading