Re: Brazilian rosewood... remind me again?
- From: Alan Marshall <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:03:23 +0000
On 13 Nov 2005 15:50:38 -0800, "Zeke Skarland" <zekeskar@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
>An opinion worth listening to indeed. Are you saying you think it is a
>very large inherant difference?. I've always thought it is pretty
>subtle. My ears would definitely hear the difference in radios that
>you describe, but I've never heard more than a pretty subtle difference
>in rosewoods -with the exception of a BRW Martin I played several years
>ago which is memorable many years and many guitars later. (by the way
>I've had a couple of other memorable guitar experiences - with
>different tone woods.). Note I'm not saying there's not a difference,
>just that my seemingly poor ears and objectively limited experience
>tells me it's pretty subtle - unlike the portable radio vs. hi-fi
>analogy. Thanks for your comments -zeke.
Another easy way to discribe it is to imagine a 5 year old well played
in Indian Rosewood guitar, most Brazilian Rosewood ones, after the
original break in period, will sound as good or better.
There are no hard and fast rules, but so far in my own experience, the
Brazilian ones have always won in this way. On the whole, a more
refined and mature sound.
Alan Marshall
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Brazilian rosewood... remind me again?
- From: Zeke Skarland
- Re: Brazilian rosewood... remind me again?
- References:
- Re: Brazilian rosewood... remind me again?
- From: Alan Marshall
- Re: Brazilian rosewood... remind me again?
- From: Zeke Skarland
- Re: Brazilian rosewood... remind me again?
- Prev by Date: Re: Whither Greensleeves?
- Next by Date: Re: Brazilian rosewood... remind me again?
- Previous by thread: Re: Brazilian rosewood... remind me again?
- Next by thread: Re: Brazilian rosewood... remind me again?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|