Re: SEPTEMBER - number of topics summary

On Oct 1, 8:33 am, UVR <u...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I feel uncomfortable to have my name called out in particular.  I am
100% certain that my contribution (such as it has been) to this end
has been no greater than that of other nettors.  I suppose the only
difference is that I've been vocal about it and they, silent.

It's your humility, that's speaking.

You have been not only vocal but also action oriented, towards
solution,

When you were stubborn about not dumping rmim, for other alternative,
I thought no change will come, flooding of spam will continue and we
will have to live with it.

Your initiative has yielded spectacular results, about which I was
very
sceptical. Many of us in the past have reported about spam, but there
was no iota of result, that experience with google made me feel that
way.

It is for everyone to see, how the rmim pages are devoid of spam, now.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SPAM attack!
    ... remove all the spam that is flooding the forum lately? ... The few long headers I looked at were all from the same NNTP server ... John Harper ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: E-mail
    ... Flooding someone's e-mail is just plain silly. ... All I had to do was hit the SPAM button. ... D/T ...
    (sci.med.transcription)
  • Re: Whats the matter with the COCKS at PuSNet. The CNN spam has been flooding for over a week!!
    ... filters and flooding customers mail boxes. ... Do these dickheads never ... And your fix for this 'spam' would be what? ...
    (uk.telecom.broadband)
  • Re: Repairing LEDs in situ.
    ... my ISP's newsgroup server has somehow filtered a lot of the spam that was flooding us a few months ago. ... Not recommended for a commercial environment, ...
    (sci.engr.lighting)