Re: Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- From: asingh8@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 30 Jun 2006 12:14:10 -0700
Daniel: You mean to reply to Abhishek or Sarangia? Or, are they same? I
don't think so.
No! Small mercies...
"Daniel Fuchs" <dfuchs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:44A56306.94DBFCE7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Abhishek,
It seems only Non-Indians having problems with my postings.
You are wrong.
Or is it a
trivial and common thing for westerners to engage in
pre-marital,extra-marital and promiscuous sexual relations.
You will never understand... It's not the subject as such (even though
the nightlife of famous masters isn't really the subject of this
newsgroup), it's the way you write about it. Naive, silly, trivial,
meaningless, childish, foolish, worthless... Simply not the way to bring
up topics of discussion.
This is my last (and most likely futile) attempt to talk sense to you.
If you continue to post nonsense, I will just keep telling you to get
lost.
Daniel
.
- References:
- Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- From: sarangiya
- Re: Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- From: DrOmPrakash
- Re: Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- From: sushama
- Re: Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- From: Daniel Fuchs
- Re: Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- From: barend
- Re: Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- From: Daniel Fuchs
- Re: Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- From: sarangiya
- Re: Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- From: Daniel Fuchs
- Re: Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- From: Daniel Fuchs
- Re: Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- From: Archisman
- Re: Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- From: Abhik Majumdar
- Re: Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- From: Daniel Fuchs
- Re: Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- From: sarangiya
- Re: Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- From: Daniel Fuchs
- Re: Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- From: Vivek Datar
- Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- Prev by Date: Re: Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- Next by Date: Re: AIR and Doordarshan
- Previous by thread: Re: Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- Next by thread: Re: Ravi Shankar Chowdhury
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading