Re: God/No God

On Apr 16, 2:22 pm, Ray <rayb...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Any "proof" or evidence of a deity is intrinsically personal, IMO.

By "proof" and "evidence" I mean them within a logical and scientific
context. That is, that which is logically and/or empirically derived
as well as testable and reproducible. That which is intrinsically
personal does not fit within this framework.

Ray, when you use "empirically" here, are you referring to its broad
meaning of something being derived through observation, experiment or
experience, or it’s narrow definition of being “of the senses,” as in
the “if I can’t touch it, taste it, etc, it ain’t real” school of
thought?

Fred
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: God/No God
    ... context. ... personal does not fit within this framework. ... I am referring to this meaning: ...
    (rec.music.gdead)
  • Re: B. O. gets one right - ALMOST
    ... things that don't fit under the framework of the scientific ... method are non-science. ... proven ARE science. ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: B. O. gets one right - ALMOST
    ... No - things that cannot be proved may, or may not, be science. ... and it fits under the framework of the ... scientific method it is science (see: ... If something can be proved - it by definition doesn't fit under the ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: B. O. gets one right - ALMOST
    ... things that don't fit under the framework of the scientific ... No - things that cannot be proved may, or may not, be science. ... the framework of the scientific method, ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: B. O. gets one right - ALMOST
    ... No - things that cannot be proved may, or may not, be science. ... and it fits under the framework of the ... scientific method it is science (see: ... If something can be proved - it by definition doesn't fit under the ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
Loading