Re: Is Obama's Wright stuff just another "non-problem"?



In article
<c55d5fee-6991-4590-b518-83e80f5b861b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Lfh <onetaste2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 14, 4:01 pm, Edwin Hurwitz <ed...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Once you get down to it, it's not that far from the religious right that
said the 9/11 was our fault because of our tolerance of gays, etc.

I say it's our fault because of our foreign policy. No matter how you
look at it, only people with an agenda or who are willfully ignorant
will say we were completely innocent and were hit because of they hate
our goodness.

Again, the point isn't to parse the degree of truth in the statements.
The point is how is this going to affect O's campaign? Believe me,
when it gets to the superdelegates, as it seems it will, there will
not be a single instance of debate re the relative merits of the
statements. It is solely going to be about whether or not this kind of
"anti-American" baggage is going to be too heavy to keep the Obama
ship afloat or whether they should cast their vote with Hillary.

Fred

I know, silly me. Candidates don't win on the facts or their platform
but on some school yard American Idol popularity contest that has all
the honesty of an offer you can't refuse.

Edwin
--
If you want to make peace, you don't talk to your friends. You talk to your
enemies.
-Moshe Dayan

.



Relevant Pages