Re: (NDC) Baseball Rules Question
- From: "Bzl." <bzlrbi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:16:19 -0400
"Brad Greer" <jjh1102us@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pdqa83pmv0ue4cqkaqb351elvfg31qmrin@xxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:12:11 -0700, "Neil X." <neilxk@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Well, the old system doesn't seem fair - you can't pretend the
visiting team didn't come up to bat and score enough runs to go ahead
now, can you? So, overall I think this is a more fair way to go.
Exactly. That's why they did it. Seems like a good change to me (even
though I'd have preferred another L in the books for the Yanks).
.
- References:
- (NDC) Baseball Rules Question
- From: Neil X.
- Re: (NDC) Baseball Rules Question
- From: mjd
- Re: (NDC) Baseball Rules Question
- From: Daniel-San
- Re: (NDC) Baseball Rules Question
- From: Neil X.
- Re: (NDC) Baseball Rules Question
- From: Brad Greer
- Re: (NDC) Baseball Rules Question
- From: Neil X.
- Re: (NDC) Baseball Rules Question
- From: Brad Greer
- Re: (NDC) Baseball Rules Question
- From: Neil X.
- Re: (NDC) Baseball Rules Question
- From: Brad Greer
- (NDC) Baseball Rules Question
- Prev by Date: Re: Public apology.
- Next by Date: Re: (NDC) Baseball Rules Question
- Previous by thread: Re: (NDC) Baseball Rules Question
- Next by thread: Re: (NDC) Baseball Rules Question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|