Re: NY Times / Where's the Other Half of Your Music File?
- From: Brad Greer <jjh1102us@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:49:36 -0400
On 31 May 2007 11:05:33 -0700, Dustydevils <spoonful2@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On May 31, 10:20?am, "Neil X." <nei...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:nd then there are some folks who will even
Iron Muffin wrote:
In other news, water is wet.
It absolutely amazes me how many folks have no idea that mp3s
compromise sound quality.
Well, wouldn't 256 kpbs MP3 be twice the size of a 128 kbps MP3? Sogo to the extreme of denying that anyone can really "hear the
difference."
Peace,
Neil X.
I think the question should also be, is selling a 256 kbps really cost
a company 30% more to produce? What a scam, it was the same with
saying they could charge more for CD's because they cost more than
albums to produce. Of course they couldn't just upgrade their .99
downloads and leave it at that. I couldn't imagine spending .99 on a
128mb downloaded song, but clearly millions of other people can.
you have to double your storage costs and have increased bandwidth to
distribute. Admittedly, storeage is cheap and so is bandwidth, but
the "manufacturing" costs have gone up.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- NY Times / Where's the Other Half of Your Music File?
- From: No one's noticed
- Re: NY Times / Where's the Other Half of Your Music File?
- From: The Iron Muffin
- Re: NY Times / Where's the Other Half of Your Music File?
- From: Neil X.
- Re: NY Times / Where's the Other Half of Your Music File?
- From: Dustydevils
- NY Times / Where's the Other Half of Your Music File?
- Prev by Date: Re: Dinosaurs on Noah's Ark!
- Next by Date: Re: Laura Ellen RIP
- Previous by thread: Re: NY Times / Where's the Other Half of Your Music File?
- Next by thread: Re: NY Times / Where's the Other Half of Your Music File?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|