Re: Tenet rats out sinking ship


"JimK" <jkezwind@comcastDOTnet> wrote in message
news:eiff3390dfagq2m1aarv2c8rdpv96gr7ls@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 1 May 2007 17:11:44 -0400, "volkfolk" <volkfolk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


"Ken Fortenberry" <kennethfortenberry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jJNZh.18330$Kd3.7023@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The way you "debate" is to address the points the make rather than
deluding yourself by pretending that your ad hominems actually
constitute some sort of substance. HTH.

Yeah, uh huh, uh huh. Oh yeah. Well, nice running into you
Seth but I've got to go, I've got a casserole in the oven I
need to check on. Talk to you later.

Maybe we can take up a collection and buy you a bunch of clues. I bet Jimk
would give us a volume discount.

Seth is dead nuts on. Your "arguements" consist of lame ad hominems and
proclaimations that anyone who disagrees with you is clueless.

My irony meter redlines with 90% of your posts

Scot


You don't want to spend the money on a bunch of clues. It's cheaper to
just buy the answer.

In Ken's case I think he needs the clues first. You can lead a horse to
water, but an ass is still an ass.

Scot


.

Loading